More on Liability of Registered Owners of Vehicles Involved in Collisions


As I’ve previously written, section 86 of the Motor Vehicle Act makes owners or lessees of vehicles responsible for any damage or loss caused by the operation of their vehicle by an individual to whom consent was given.
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court interpreting the meaning of ‘consent’.  In today’s case (Morris v. Morris) the Plaintiff was injured when riding as a passenger in a vehicle driven by his brother.  The vehicle was rented from Enterprise Rent-A-Car.   The Plaintiff sued the driver and the rental car company.
The vehicle, however, was not rented to the Plaintiff’s brother, but rather his mother.  The rental contact stated “No Other Driver Permitted“.   Despite this restriction, after renting the vehicle the Plaintiff’s mother let the Plaintiff’s brother drive the vehicle.
The issue at trial was whether, in these circumstances, Enterprise Rent-A-Car could be held liable as registered owner.  A recent case (McEvoy v. McEachnie) held that a registered owner can be held liable in similar circumstances (click here to read my summary of the McEvoy case).  In today’s case, however, Mr. Justice Cole refused to follow the precedent set in McEvoy finding that the judge in that case “failed to consider binding authority“.  In finding the rental company not liable as having not consented to the driver operating the vehicle Mr. Justice Cole summarized the law and distinguished the McEvoy case as follows:

[31] The most recent case from British Columbia dealing with the interpretation of implied consent under s. 86 of the Act, and the plaintiff argues I am bound by that decision, isMcEvoy v. McEachnie, 2008 BCSC 1496 [McEvoy]. In that case, a father gave his daughter consent to drive his vehicle but made it expressly clear that no other drivers were permitted. The daughter subsequently allowed her friend to drive the vehicle, because she was intoxicated, and an accident ensued. In finding the father liable, the Court appliedBarreiro, a case where a rental car employee consented to a vehicle being rented by an underage driver, contrary to company procedure, and interpreted it, at para. 32, to stand for the proposition that:

[32] … so long as the transfer of car keys from owner to second party is done by an exercise of free will, and the second party gives the keys to a third party by free will, the owner will be deemed to have consented to the third party’s possession of the car. That will be the result even though the owner and the second party had an understanding that the third party was not to ever get possession of those keys.

[32]         The Court in McEvoy concluded that, except for the fact that the father did not obtain a financial benefit from the friend’s possession of the vehicle, the case was not distinguishable from Barreiro. In the present case, other than the fact that the agreement forbidding other drivers was written, rather than oral, the facts cannot be distinguished  from McEvoy. Enterprise freely gave the keys to Ms. Kauth, she freely gave the keys to Mr. Morris, despite expressly agreeing that there would be no other drivers. Enterprise would, on the logic of McEvoy, be taken to have consented to Mr. Morris’ possession of the vehicle and therefore, Enterprise would be vicariously liable pursuant to s. 86 of the Act for any liability that Mr. Morris may have for this accident.

[33]         On its face, it would appear that this decision would be binding on this Court, because the facts cannot be differentiated merely because the agreement in McEvoy was oral and not written. In Hansard, Spruce Mills Ltd., Re (1954), 4 D.L.R. 590 at 592, 13 W.W.R. (N.S.) 285 (B.C.S.C.) [Hansard], the Court held that a trial judge should follow the decisions of his brother judges of the same court unless subsequent decisions have affected the validity of the impugned judgment; it is demonstrated that some binding authority in case law or some relevant statute was not considered; or the judgment was unconsidered, where an immediate decision is given without the opportunity to fully consult authority. If none of these situations exist, barring a distinguishing feature between the facts, a court would be correct in following decisions of a court of the same level.

[34] On the basis of the test set out in Hansard, McEvoy in my view is not binding on this Court as it failed to consider binding authority. In Godsman, Smaldino, Prasad and Louisthe Court refused to find consent where it would not have been given in the circumstances. McEvoy overlooks these decisions and does not consider this test.

[35] The Court instead held the father liable because they interpreted Barreiro to mean that if keys are transferred by free will to the daughter, the father is deemed to consent to subsequent transfers of possession including his daughter’s friend’s possession. However, in Barreiro the company transferred possession to the rental car employee and gave the employee the authority to transfer possession to people wishing to rent the vehicle. Therefore the employee had authority to transfer the vehicle subject to following proper procedures, but in McEvoy the daughter lacked authority to transfer the vehicle.

[36] Furthermore, the Court in McEvoy relied upon Morrison to support the finding of consent. In Morrison, consent was given subject to conditions upon the authorized driver, namely that the company vehicle was not to be operated by an employee for personal use. These conditions were breached, but the Court held that the conditions did not vitiate the consent. In McEvoy, the Court interpreted “no other drivers” as a condition. However, in my view there is a distinction between no consent at all and consent subject to conditions. The Court should first find implied consent exists on all the circumstances and then apply Morrison to any conditions added to that implied consent: K.T. v. Tran, 2007 ABCA 13, 280 D.L.R. (4th) 142.

[37] Had the Court in McEvoy considered Godsman, Smaldino, Prasad and Louis, the result may have still been the same on the second ground for finding consent, stated by Mr. Justice Rogers, but not on the first. Based on Godsman, Smaldino, Prasad and Louis, consent can only be implied if it would have been granted as a matter of course in the circumstances. In McEvoy, the father’s purpose in telling the children to not let others drive his cars was not to limit his statutory liability as the car’s owner, but because he trusted his kids but not their friends and he wanted to keep his children and his cars safe. It could be argued that the father in McEvoy would have consented in the circumstances to the friend driving because his daughter was intoxicated and he would want the car and his daughter home safely. On the present facts, like in Prasad, it is hard to imagine that Enterprise would have given consent in the circumstances.

[38] The trend in our jurisprudence tends to be more restrictive than the broad policy approach that is taken in some United States jurisdictions and in some degrees by the Alberta courts. I am satisfied that the test for implied consent in British Columbia is whether the owner would have consented in the circumstances:  Godsman, Smaldino, Prasad and Louis. Based on the facts of the present case, there was no express consent given by Enterprise to Mr. Morris and in my view, it is clear that consent would not have been given in the circumstances. Enterprise did everything possible to limit its liability and if its liability is to be extended in any event, to prefer the protection of third parties, then that is the job of the Legislature to rewrite the wording of the statute.

[39] I therefore dismiss the action against the defendant Enterprise and they are entitled to their costs.

I understand that the McEvoy case is going to be heard by the BC Court of Appeal in the near future and the law of ‘consent’ with respect to registered owner liability should hopefully be more clear after they weigh in on this issue.

consent, express consent, implied consent, lessee liability, McEvoy v. McEachnie, Morris v. Morris, Mr. Justice Cole, Registered owner liability, s. 86 motor vehicle act, vicarious liability

Comments (68)

  • I just want to tell you that I am beginner to blogs and truly savored you’re web blog. Very likely I’m going to bookmark your site . You certainly have incredible stories. Thank you for sharing with us your web page.

  • Unquestionably believe that which you said. Your favorite reason seemed to be on the net the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people consider worries that they just don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

  • Hi, Neat post. There’s a problem with your site in internet explorer, would check this… IE still is the market leader and a big portion of people will miss your excellent writing due to this problem.

  • Hello, Neat post. There’s an issue with your web site in internet explorer, might check this… IE still is the market chief and a good section of folks will pass over your excellent writing because of this problem.

  • Thanks for any other great article. Where else may just anybody get that kind of info in such an ideal means of writing? I’ve a presentation subsequent week, and I’m at the search for such info.

  • Hello, i believe that i saw you visited my web site thus i got here to “go back the choose”.I am attempting to find issues to improve my website!I assume its adequate to make use of a few of your concepts!!

  • I found your blog website on google and verify a few of your early posts. Proceed to keep up the very good operate. I simply extra up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Searching for ahead to reading more from you in a while!…

  • I’m still learning from you, as I’m trying to achieve my goals. I definitely enjoy reading all that is written on your site.Keep the posts coming. I enjoyed it!

  • Thanks , I’ve recently been looking for info about this subject for ages and yours is the best I have discovered so far. But, what about the conclusion? Are you sure about the source?

  • Greetings from Florida! I’m bored to death at work so I decided to browse your website on my iphone during lunch break. I really like the information you provide here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m surprised at how quick your blog loaded on my phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, superb blog!

  • An fascinating dialogue is price comment. I believe that you should write extra on this topic, it won’t be a taboo topic but usually people are not sufficient to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers

  • Repulsive questions contented him few extensive supported. Of remarkably thoroughly he appearance in. Supposing tolerably applauded or of be. Suffering unfeeling so objection agreeable allowance me of. Ask within entire season sex common far who family. As be valley warmth assure on. Park girl they rich hour new well way you. Face ye be me been room we sons fond.

  • It’s my belief that mesothelioma can be the most fatal cancer. It’s got unusual attributes. The more I look at it the harder I am sure it does not respond like a true solid tissues cancer. When mesothelioma is often a rogue virus-like infection, therefore there is the potential for developing a vaccine and also offering vaccination to asbestos open people who are vulnerable to high risk associated with developing long run asbestos relevant malignancies. Thanks for discussing your ideas about this important health issue.

  • Excellent goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just extremely wonderful. I actually like what you have acquired here, really like what you are stating and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it smart. I can’t wait to read much more from you. This is actually a tremendous website.

  • I have to show some appreciation to you for bailing me out of such a circumstance. Because of scouting through the internet and coming across recommendations that were not productive, I assumed my entire life was well over. Being alive without the presence of approaches to the difficulties you have sorted out by way of your good write-up is a critical case, and those which could have badly affected my entire career if I had not discovered your web page. Your main mastery and kindness in touching all the details was very useful. I am not sure what I would have done if I hadn’t encountered such a subject like this. It’s possible to at this time relish my future. Thank you very much for the specialized and effective help. I will not think twice to recommend your web site to anybody who needs to have assistance on this area.

  • You could certainly see your expertise within the paintings you write. The sector hopes for more passionate writers like you who aren’t afraid to say how they believe. At all times go after your heart.

  • Thanks, I’ve recently been looking for info about this subject for ages and yours is the best I’ve found out so far. However, what about the conclusion? Are you sure about the source?

  • I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own weblog and was wondering what all is needed to get set up? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very web savvy so I’m not 100 sure. Any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you

  • Thank you for all your valuable effort on this site. My mum take interest in engaging in investigations and it’s easy to understand why. We notice all of the powerful method you give insightful guides through this web blog and as well as foster response from website visitors on this situation plus our simple princess has always been becoming educated a lot of things. Enjoy the remaining portion of the year. You are carrying out a great job.

  • I have observed that in the world today, video games will be the latest rage with kids of all ages. Many times it may be extremely hard to drag your children away from the games. If you want the very best of both worlds, there are various educational video games for kids. Interesting post.

  • Thanks for giving your ideas. The one thing is that pupils have a choice between national student loan along with a private education loan where it can be easier to select student loan debt consolidation reduction than with the federal student loan.

  • With havin so much content do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright infringement? My site has a lot of unique content I’ve either written myself or outsourced but it looks like a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my permission. Do you know any ways to help protect against content from being stolen? I’d truly appreciate it.

  • Hi! I know this is kinda off topic however I’d figured I’d ask. Would you be interested in trading links or maybe guest authoring a blog post or vice-versa? My site goes over a lot of the same topics as yours and I feel we could greatly benefit from each other. If you might be interested feel free to shoot me an e-mail. I look forward to hearing from you! Fantastic blog by the way!

  • One other issue is that if you are in a circumstances where you will not have a cosigner then you may want to try to wear out all of your educational funding options. You will discover many grants and other scholarships and grants that will offer you money to help with education expenses. Thanks a lot for the post.

  • One other issue is that if you are in a predicament where you do not have a cosigner then you may really want to try to make use of all of your financing options. You will find many grants or loans and other grants that will give you finances to aid with school expenses. Thx for the post.

  • You could definitely see your skills in the work you write. The world hopes for more passionate writers like you who are not afraid to say how they believe. Always follow your heart.

  • My spouse and i were absolutely happy Albert managed to finish off his inquiry using the ideas he obtained through your web pages. It is now and again perplexing to simply continually be making a gift of instructions that most people have been selling. And we realize we’ve got the blog owner to be grateful to for that. The explanations you’ve made, the straightforward blog navigation, the relationships you can make it possible to promote – it’s got most unbelievable, and it’s making our son in addition to the family believe that that situation is interesting, which is extremely mandatory. Thanks for all the pieces!

  • Good day very nice site!! Man .. Beautiful .. Wonderful .. I’ll bookmark your website and take the feeds also…I’m satisfied to seek out so many helpful info right here within the put up, we want work out more strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing.

  • Thanks for another excellent post. Where else could anybody get that kind of information in such an ideal way of writing? I’ve a presentation next week, and I am on the look for such information.

  • Hi there, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam remarks? If so how do you reduce it, any plugin or anything you can suggest? I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so any support is very much appreciated.

  • fantastic post, very informative. I wonder why the other specialists of this sector don’t notice this. You must continue your writing. I’m sure, you’ve a huge readers’ base already!

  • Undeniably believe that which you said. Your favorite reason seemed to be on the web the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while people consider worries that they just don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people could take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

  • When I initially commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get four e-mails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove me from that service? Bless you!

  • I’ll right away grab your rss feed as I can not find your e-mail subscription link or e-newsletter service. Do you’ve any? Kindly let me know so that I could subscribe. Thanks.

  • You can certainly see your skills within the work you write. The sector hopes for even more passionate writers such as you who aren’t afraid to mention how they believe. All the time go after your heart. “The point of quotations is that one can use another’s words to be insulting.” by Amanda Cross.

  • Thanks for every other informative website. The place else may I am getting that kind of info written in such an ideal manner? I’ve a mission that I’m just now running on, and I have been on the look out for such info.

Comments are closed.

Contact

If you would like further information or require assistance, please get in touch.

ERIK
MAGRAKEN

Personal Injury Lawyer

When not writing the BC Injury Law Blog, Erik is the managing partner at MacIsaac & Company, based in Victoria, B.C. He is also involved with combative sports regulatory issues and authors the Combat Sports Law Blog.

“Work hard, be kind and enjoy the ride!”
Erik’s Philosophy

    Disclaimer