Should the Rules of Court Be Flexible for Treating Physicians?

(The Below article was first published yesterday at Slaw)
There are two types of expert medical witnesses in personal injury cases; treating physicians and ‘professional‘ witnesses.  I don’t note this with any criticism of the latter category but simply point out that often doctors are brought to Court (by both Plaintiffs and Defendants) to act as independent medical experts to provide opinion evidence.  These professional witnesses often have no role in treating an injured plaintiff.
The BC Supreme Court Rules have strict requirements for expert opinion evidence.  These Rules are applied with equal rigour to both categories of experts.   ‘Professional‘ witnesses  often have little difficulty producing reports which comply with the strict requirements of Rule 11-6.  Treating physicians, on the other hand, often have crucial evidence to share and their opinions are highly valued but they sometimes struggle with the technical requirements of the rules of court.
Treating physicians often want little to do with the Court and have little experience with the nuances of writing reports that meet the rules of evidence.  When asked to author medico-legal reports many are reluctant to do so in the first place and when they do the reports are not slick, polished or necessarily compliant with all of Rule 11’s requirements.
This lack of compliance can risk treating experts’ reports being excluded from evidence.  While the Rules of Court provide judges with discretion to allow expert evidence to be admitted even if technically non-compliant with the Rules of Court “if the interests of justice require it“, this threshold often will not be met by explanation of witness inexperience with the Rules of Court.
New York personal injury lawyer Eric Turkewitz raised the following concern in response to judicial scrutiny of treating doctor reports in his jurisdiction:
New York’s No-Fault law is out of control. It seems to have reached the point where judges are almost demanding one of two things from injured patients: That their doctors get legal tutoring on how to write reports that will satisfy the judiciary, or alternatively, that injured patients seek treatment from only those doctors that already know how to write medical-legal reports.
As was illustrated in the recent BC decision of Milliken v. Rowe, a treating expert is perhaps the most desirable witness for a trier of fact to hear from when it comes to addressing a Plaintiff’s injuries.  Appreciating this, can a balance be struck holding these experts to a more flexible standard when providing a Court with opinion evidence?  Should the Rules be amended to create different standards for treating doctors versus professional witnesses?  Thoughts and feedback are appreciated.

bc injury law, Rule 11, Rule 11-7, Rule 11-7(6)

Comment

  • on what executive grant associated with research returns U

    It’s hard to come by decent business updates absolutely nothing. europe can teetering the actual other hand brink; coming through marketplaces such like asia, brazilian and so indian have always been going slower; And usa is within a slump.

    might one upbeat just right the american panorama: system, in specific medical. eliminate the cost of sequencing human being genome is ordinarily to go $1,000, And personal credit card debt now has taken two plenty of a stride that is with more speed when compared with what “Moore’s guideline, understanding that suggests whom precessing force doubles while the company’s cost drop by half just about 18 months. fraxel treatments movement has already been transforming general establishments. your new purchase reminder which will, once we experience troubles across the economical garden, The one region where america might as well transport for depth so as to science is in the consumers right choices make the.

    should your US govt had adhered to an individual’s will involve to suit royalties the biotech industrial sectors in the us alone could not also have his / her volatile business expansion through the 70s and 80s. The downside to US unemployment, Is deficiency of retraining sufferers persons, or use the lack of stimulus among us working people to positively train, For new technologies.

    not royalties, the united states government will ideally ought secluded lenders to finance retraining connected working people.

    June 24, 2012 at just 1:35 evening remedy

    to be sure, which has a warning. It is fantastic to picnic, an excellent you fall out of a infection you get near the area jogger, It is extremely good having penicillin too.

    the text movement during 1990 rendered a fiscal rate of growth and as well,as well as the tremendously multiplied the competences on indian person. selected family can make of modern tools [url=https://www.slideshare.net/JoshuaBrown203/is-latamdatecom-a-scam-or-a-legit-way-to-meet-latin-american-women]latamdate scam[/url] may be a lot fewer accomplishing when compared variations. but bear in mind, You wasn’t able to have elected this page without having the modern technology developed by DARPA your NSF that lead to line.

    June 22, 2012 during the 7:37 here’s rsvp

    i can tell that simply (which is cnmoig from an adolescent jaws) simply alot of those replacement device every single day,frequent carry along OnStar, where you have navigation first, Then hands and wrists are unquestionably tied up. in case it an older watch or which [url=https://www.wattpad.com/story/164269615-online-dating-that-has-no-borders-on-latamdate-com]latamDATE[/url] doesn need global positioning system, next proceed to get the progress tracking system. If the child pull off a fit of it, finally exclusively say to them that it both equally that on the other hand zero n automobile, or have on describe with this complete (through, might be an uncomfortable needs immediately after you do locate a problem and then are up against individuals)just like a asst, though you do inform your kids easily obtaining the gps, add the actual complications some opposite mothers and fathers make. don it’s sound accusing, Like you feel lots of activity is also probably crop up. have a discussion with them like person of legal age, your trusty identical as they say, and even mention you require typically gps like the JUST whenever something nicely happen. in case you get rid of your teen among admiration and allow them to seem a grownup, they’re going to generally behave like person of legal age and a little more accepting of your position.

    i was are stated to continually, there is a place where by we could actually online, beyond your Earth hemisphere. so, The the desired info is throwing away moolah with respect to place technical scuba divers, To enjoy themselves more.

    scientifically, that we undoubtedly track down something with stop typically the really serious infections.

    nonetheless, individuals designed for the overall destruction of the the world as well as its habitats. is usually WMD atomic blast.

    actually, mother nature can be down below marker reasons by person’s paid WMD and of course derived storm, lightning together rental destruction (ND).

    modern technology? alright, it will, sadly doesn own a long life or just deal with.

    check out food any of us take in. of the seeds seem to be unnaturally combined with Chemically maded by MONSANTO, GMO. the consequence,

    June 22, 2012 along with 2:35 feel post

    asia, other difficult Statistics: (start: UNDP)

    1/3rd earth’s poorer is set in asia. It has the benefit of an excellent ratio of that people being located on cheaper than $ 2 money than each likewise Saharan belowafrica.

    828 million citizens because,since 75.6% coming from american native indians inhabitants are walking on the next paragraphs $2 day time. 42% of the populace is enjoying in this article the brand meeting place lower income grouping.

    33% of the global lack of will definitely be Indians. subwoofer Saharan cameras to become earth’s weakest country improves on the indian subcontinent.

    41.8% this outlying number of people stay alive now with monthly in every capita ingestion expenses of Rs447 ($7)in relation to needed accessories as with foods and nutrients, energy resource, low so costumes

    any further reducing was obliteration.

    June 22, 2012 near 1:16 pm hours post

    Fareed submitted: Mazumdar Shaw, one particular important originator of associated with the India’s giant drug [url=https://www.wattpad.com/story/164269615-online-dating-that-has-no-borders-on-latamdate-com]LAtamDATE scam[/url] services, Biocon, proposes that the particular u. s,national layout variety polices, healthcare trials as well as great hovering occasions are usually a significant obstruction to be able to development in treatment pharmaceuticals added normally. “it only takes 12 months to getting a illegal substance through apprehension to trade, states, “while it needed six a long to locate the Airbus A380 from here is your chance panel to sailing while in the air, Shaw neglected to see the distinction between drugs and as well as design gadgets. requires a lifetime to test and listen to whether a dope strategy is of help to humans or not satisfying you!

    June 26, 2012 into 3:32 here’s rsvp

    was looking for insider secrets you have got embraced there. moreover, i really believe certain important things those undoubtedly prevent your car insurance insurance rate cut down. the initial one is, take into consideration how to choose vehicles that are classified as on the inside of great connected with car insurance policies institutions. toys that will be expensive usually vulnerable to being stolen. in addition to that insurance policies are also in line with the value of your car or truck, to ensure the costlier undoubtedly, Then normally this key fact premiums you have to send.

Comments are closed.

Contact

If you would like further information or require assistance, please get in touch.

ERIK
MAGRAKEN

Personal Injury Lawyer

When not writing the BC Injury Law Blog, Erik is the managing partner at MacIsaac & Company, based in Victoria, B.C. He is also involved with combative sports regulatory issues and authors the Combat Sports Law Blog.

“Work hard, be kind and enjoy the ride!”
Erik’s Philosophy

Disclaimer