Double Costs Application Allowed To Proceed Despite Entered Order Addressing Costs

In interesting reasons for judgement released today by the BC Supreme Court, Chilliwack Registry, Chief Justice Hinkson determined that a double costs application could proceed despite the entry of an order addressing costs.
In today’s case (Keller v. Pearson) the Plaintiff was injured in a collision and sued for damages.  Prior to trial ICBC offered to settle the case for $70,000.  The Plaintiff rejected the offer and proceeded to trial where the case was dismissed with costs payable to the Defendant.  The Court did not address the consequences of the formal offer.  An order was entered which read “The Plaintiff shall pay the Defendants’ costs in this action, subject to the Plaintiff being at liberty to request to reappear before the Court to make submissions in respect of same.”.
The Defendant then sought double costs relying on their pre trial formal offer.  The Plaintiff argued the Court was functus officio.  Mr. Justice Hinkson disagreed and provided the following reasons addressing the narrow exception to address costs following an entered order:
[10]         The plaintiff contends that it is he, and he alone, who was permitted by the entered order to reappear before the Court to make submissions as to costs, and that the defendants have no basis upon which to advance any submissions with respect to double costs.
[11]         While it may have been open to the defendants to make submissions seeking double costs before the entry of the order, the order addresses their entitlement to costs, subject only to the plaintiff’s request to reappear before the Court. No such request has been made by the plaintiff, and the defendants’ entitlement to costs in the matter has been determined by the summary trial judge.
[12]         In Buschau v. Rogers Communications Inc., 2004 BCCA 142 at paras. 26–27, 237 D.L.R. (4th) 260, Newbury J.A. stated:
[26]      …The Court also had the power to amend the entered order on the basis that it contained an error in expressing the manifest intention of the Court. As stated by Rinfret J. for the Supreme Court of Canada in Paper Machinery, [[1934] S.C.R. 186]:
            The question really is therefore whether there is power in the Court to amend a judgment which has been drawn up and entered. In such a case, the rule followed in England is, we think — and we see no reason why it should not also be the rule followed by this Court — that there is no power to amend a judgment which has been drawn up and entered, except in two cases: (1) Where there has been a slip in drawing it up, or (2) Where there has been error in expressing the manifest intention of the court (In re Swire [(1885) 30 Ch. D. 239]; Preston Banking Company v. Allsup & Sons, [[1895] 1 Ch. 141]; Ainsworth v. Wilding, [[1896] 1 Ch. 673]). [at 188; emphasis added.]
Paper Machinery has been cited on numerous occasions by Canadian courts, including this court in R. v. Blaker (1983), 46 B.C.L.R. 344, at 347, and in Racz v. District of Mission (1988) 22 B.C.L.R. (2d) 70. In the latter case, the Court set aside a “consent dismissal order” entered by a solicitor who had acted without authority. The Court found that it had inherent jurisdiction to correct what would otherwise be an abuse of process and ruled that it was not necessary to require the plaintiff to bring a fresh action in order to set the order aside. On this point, the Court agreed with Chief Justice Sinclair in Morstad v. Quintal (1980) 14 Alta. L.R. (2d) 369 (Q.B.), who had said that [at p. 371]:
… it must surely be within the inherent jurisdiction of this court to grant the relief sought by the plaintiff on the present motion without the necessity of going through the sterile routine of commencing a separate action, a proceeding which would not result in the bringing forth of additional facts or otherwise advancing the administration of justice.
Hutcheon J.A. in Racz noted that in Morstad, the order nisi as entered had been “based on a mutual mistake of fact.” (At 73.)
[27]      Even if the error in the order was not a “clerical” one or an error arising from an “accidental slip or omission” within the meaning of Rule 41(24), then, the court below had the inherent jurisdiction to correct the order insofar as it did not reflect its manifest intention. In the absence of any evidence that the respondents had taken any irrevocable step in reliance on the order, or would suffer undue prejudice were it corrected, I conclude that the Court should have exercised this jurisdiction and corrected its order. In my view, it cannot be in the interests of justice for the respondents to rely on that order to retain a sum to which they have no entitlement in principle.
[13]         I am unable to see that either of the two exceptions discussed in Paper Machinery apply in this case. I am advised that the entered order was drafted by counsel for the defendants.  There is no suggestion that there was any “slip” in drawing it up, nor does it evidence any error in expressing the manifest intention of the court. There is no suggestion before me that Smart J. was asked to order double costs, and there is no basis upon which it could be argued that he intended to do so.
[14]         Nor is this a situation such as that dealt with by Mr. Justice Burnyeat in GC Parking Ltd. v. New West Ventures Ltd. et al, 2004 BCSC 1700, 9 C.P.C. (6th) 245, where after an order awarding costs on Scale 3 against the defendants was made, the order entered made no reference to costs as the plaintiff specifically advised the defendants that it intended to make further submissions respecting an alleged entitlement to double costs. In that circumstance, Burnyeat J. held at para. 17 that:
[17]      The court can be functus officio where the entered order accurately deals with matters which were dealt with in the Reasons for Judgment but retain jurisdiction to deal with matters which were not set out in the entered order but which were dealt with in the Reasons for Judgment. Bavelas v. Copley, [2000] B.C.J. (Q.L.) No. 523 (B.C.S.C.) dealt with an order entered with respect to liability and damages but not with respect to costs. Drost J. held that the entry of the order rendered the court functus offico “except with respect to the issue of costs” (at para. 20).
[15]         While I respectfully agree with this statement by Burnyeat J., in the case before me, the entered order reflected the disposition of costs as set out in the reasons for judgment.
[16]         However, in Smart v. McCall Pontiac Buick Ltd., 2001 BCSC 467, [2001] B.C.J. No. 682, special costs were awarded to the plaintiff in a written judgment, and an order was entered providing for special costs. An application was then brought by the plaintiff for double costs based upon an offer to settle made by the plaintiff. Mr. Justice McKinnon reasoned that despite the entered order, he could hear the plaintiff’s application for double costs arising from the defendants’ failure to take advantage of an offer, which was substantially below the amount awarded, as he was unaware of the offer to settle and unentitled to know about it when delivering his reasons for judgment.
[17]         I am unable to distinguish the factual underpinnings in Smart from those in this case. Despite the entry of the order in this case, based upon the principle of judicial comity discussed in Re Spruce Hansard Mills Ltd., [1954] 4 D.L.R. 590, 34 C.B.R. 202, I find that I am obliged to hear the defendants’ application for double costs.
 

bc injury law, Chief Justice Hinkson, Functus Officio, Keller v. Pearson

Comments (48)

  • I just want to mention I’m newbie to blogging and site-building and absolutely liked your web blog. Almost certainly I’m going to bookmark your blog . You actually have superb articles. Regards for sharing your web-site.

  • I don’t even know how I ended up right here, however I believed this post was great. I do not recognize who you might be but definitely you are going to a well-known blogger in the event you are not already 😉 Cheers!

  • One thing is always that one of the most common incentives for using your credit card is a cash-back as well as rebate supply. Generally, you’re going to get 1-5% back upon various expenditures. Depending on the cards, you may get 1% in return on most expenses, and 5% back on expenses made in convenience stores, gasoline stations, grocery stores and ‘member merchants’.

  • Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it is truly informative. I am gonna watch out for brussels. I will be grateful if you continue this in future. Numerous people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  • whoah this blog is great i like reading your articles. Stay up the good work! You recognize, a lot of individuals are searching around for this info, you could help them greatly.

  • One other issue is that if you are in a situation where you would not have a cosigner then you may really need to try to exhaust all of your federal funding options. You can find many funds and other scholarships that will present you with funding to help with college expenses. Thanks a lot for the post.

  • You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be really something that I think I would never understand. It seems too complicated and very broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I’ll try to get the hang of it!

  • We’re a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your website offered us with valuable information to work on. You’ve done a formidable job and our entire community will be thankful to you.

  • Hey! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of my good old room mate! He always kept chatting about this. I will forward this page to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thank you for sharing!

  • I think this is one of the most important info for me. And i am glad reading your article. But want to remark on few general things, The web site style is wonderful, the articles is really nice : D. Good job, cheers

  • Thank you for every other fantastic article. Where else may just anybody get that kind of information in such a perfect way of writing? I’ve a presentation subsequent week, and I’m on the look for such info.

  • I was recommended this web site by my cousin. I’m not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my difficulty. You’re amazing! Thanks!

  • Hey there! I’m at work browsing your blog from my new iphone 4! Just wanted to say I love reading through your blog and look forward to all your posts! Carry on the superb work!

  • Excellent goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just too wonderful. I really like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you are saying and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still take care of to keep it smart. I can’t wait to read much more from you. This is actually a terrific web site.

  • I used to be very happy to search out this net-site.I needed to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I definitely having fun with every little little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you blog post.

  • Hello, Neat post. There is a problem together with your website in internet explorer, would check this¡K IE still is the market leader and a large element of folks will miss your excellent writing due to this problem.

  • Its such as you read my thoughts! You seem to grasp a lot approximately this, such as you wrote the ebook in it or something. I think that you simply can do with a few to force the message home a bit, however instead of that, this is magnificent blog. An excellent read. I’ll definitely be back.

  • Fantastic goods from you, man. I’ve take into accout your stuff prior to and you’re simply extremely wonderful. I actually like what you have acquired right here, certainly like what you’re stating and the best way in which you assert it. You make it entertaining and you still care for to keep it smart. I can’t wait to learn far more from you. That is really a tremendous web site.

  • Hello there! I know this is kinda off topic but I’d figured I’d ask. Would you be interested in trading links or maybe guest authoring a blog article or vice-versa? My site covers a lot of the same topics as yours and I feel we could greatly benefit from each other. If you are interested feel free to shoot me an e-mail. I look forward to hearing from you! Excellent blog by the way!

  • I wish to express my appreciation to the writer just for rescuing me from this situation. Right after surfing through the internet and seeing concepts which are not powerful, I thought my entire life was done. Living devoid of the answers to the problems you’ve resolved through your main report is a crucial case, as well as the ones which might have in a wrong way damaged my career if I hadn’t discovered the website. Your actual expertise and kindness in handling the whole lot was excellent. I am not sure what I would’ve done if I hadn’t come upon such a point like this. I can at this time relish my future. Thank you very much for your professional and amazing help. I will not be reluctant to refer your web blog to anyone who should get guidance about this area.

  • Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to assert that I acquire in fact enjoyed account your blog posts. Anyway I’ll be subscribing to your feeds and even I achievement you access consistently fast.

  • Great write-up, I am normal visitor of one’s website, maintain up the excellent operate, and It’s going to be a regular visitor for a long time.

  • I’ve been surfing on-line more than 3 hours as of late, but I by no means found any interesting article like yours. It is beautiful price enough for me. In my opinion, if all web owners and bloggers made just right content material as you did, the net can be a lot more helpful than ever before. “No nation was ever ruined by trade.” by Benjamin Franklin.

  • Hi there! Someone in my Myspace group shared this website with us so I came to check it out. I’m definitely enjoying the information. I’m book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Great blog and fantastic design.

  • Hi there just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your content seem to be running off the screen in Chrome. I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know. The style and design look great though! Hope you get the issue resolved soon. Kudos

  • Hello There. I found your weblog the use of msn. This is a very smartly written article. I will make sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your helpful info. Thanks for the post. I will certainly return.

  • I have been surfing online greater than three hours lately, but I by no means found any interesting article like yours. It’s pretty price sufficient for me. In my view, if all web owners and bloggers made just right content material as you did, the internet will likely be a lot more helpful than ever before. “Learn to see in another’s calamity the ills which you should avoid.” by Publilius Syrus.

  • Hi there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and found that it’s truly informative. I’m going to watch out for brussels. I’ll be grateful if you continue this in future. A lot of people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  • Definitely believe that which you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the internet the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get irked while people think about worries that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people could take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

  • I just like the valuable info you provide on your articles. I will bookmark your blog and check again here frequently. I am reasonably sure I will be told lots of new stuff proper right here! Good luck for the following!

  • I’ll right away seize your rss as I can not to find your email subscription link or newsletter service. Do you have any? Kindly permit me realize in order that I could subscribe. Thanks.

  • The core of your writing while appearing agreeable in the beginning, did not sit well with me after some time. Someplace throughout the paragraphs you actually managed to make me a believer unfortunately only for a short while. I however have got a problem with your leaps in assumptions and one might do nicely to fill in all those gaps. In the event that you can accomplish that, I could definitely end up being fascinated.

  • It’s really a nice and useful piece of information. I am happy that you just shared this useful information with us. Please stay us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  • You really make it seem really easy with your presentation but I in finding this matter to be really something which I believe I might never understand. It kind of feels too complex and very wide for me. I’m looking ahead on your subsequent post, I¡¦ll attempt to get the hang of it!

  • Just want to say your article is as surprising. The clearness to your put up is simply great and i can think you’re a professional on this subject. Well along with your permission allow me to take hold of your feed to stay updated with imminent post. Thanks a million and please continue the gratifying work.

Comments are closed.

Contact

If you would like further information or require assistance, please get in touch.

ERIK
MAGRAKEN

Personal Injury Lawyer

When not writing the BC Injury Law Blog, Erik is the managing partner at MacIsaac & Company, based in Victoria, B.C. He is also involved with combative sports regulatory issues and authors the Combat Sports Law Blog.

“Work hard, be kind and enjoy the ride!”
Erik’s Philosophy

Disclaimer