Defamation Law – Hyperlinks and Publication

An important case was released today by the BC Court of Appeal (Crookes v. Newton) dealing with defamation law.  When a Defendant is sued for defamation it must be proven that defamatory material was “published”.  Today’s case was the first from a Canadian Appellate Court which dealt with the issue of whether an author of an article who provides a hyperlink to another article which contains defamatory material constitutes ‘publication’.
The BC Court of Appeal held that “there is no basis for finding a presumption of publication of the hyperlinked articles and that the mere fact (the Defendant) hyperlinked the impugned sites does not make him a publisher of the material found at the hyperlinked sites”.  The key discussion is set out at paragraphs80-93 which I set out below:

[80] There are two aspects to the publication element of the tort of defamation. The first, relating to the defendant as publisher, concerns the act of promulgating the impugned item. The second, relating to the third party receiver of the impugned item, concerns the receipt of that item by a person within the court’s jurisdiction. (I refer to the issue of jurisdiction because publication, to be actionable, must be within this jurisdiction, and publication of internet material occurs where the words are read:  King v. Lewis, [2005] E.M.L.R. 45, C.A.;Gutnick v. Dow Jones, [2002] H.C.A. 56.) In my respectful view, the reasons for judgment of my learned colleague mix these issues as one.

[81] The first of these two aspects is whether, by creating the hyperlinks in question, Mr. Newton can be seen to have promulgated a writing or message that is defamatory of the appellant. A near case was considered by this Court in Carter v. B.C. Federation of Foster Parents Assn., 2005 BCCA 398, 42 B.C.L.R. (4th) 1. The issue in Carter was whether the defendant, in publishing a web address at which the allegedly defamatory material was contained, had re-published that material. Mr. Justice Hall, for this Court, in holding it did not, said:

[12]      In my opinion, the factual situation here is closer to the situation found to exist in the New York cases of MacFadden v. Anthony, 117 N.Y.S. (2d) 520 (Sup. Ct. 1952) andKlein v. Biben, 296 N.Y. 638 (Ct. App. 1946), referred to by the trial judge, where the courts held reference to an article containing defamatory comment without repetition of the comment itself should not be found to be a republication of such defamatory comment.

[82] While the circumstances of Carter differ from those before us, there is, in my view, no substantial difference between providing a web address and a mere hyperlink. Whether the hyperlink is a web address, as is often the case, or a more specific reference, both require a decision on the part of the reader to access another website, and both require the reader to take a distinct action, in the one case typing in a web address and in the other case clicking on the hyperlink. In other words, there is a barrier between the accessed article and the hyperlinked site that must be bridged, not by the publisher, but by the reader. The essence of following a hyperlink is to leave the website one was at to enter a different and independent website.

[83] Nor am I persuaded that in this era of rapidly changing technology we should assume access from a mere web address mentioned in an article will require any more effort than from a hyperlink. It is easy to contemplate a program whereby a click of a computer mouse engages a program on the reader’s computer that effects the same result as a hyperlink. In other words, I agree with my colleague’s conclusion at para. 58:

I agree with the trial judge that the reasoning of this Court in Carter supports Mr. Newton’s position that the mere fact he hyperlinked the impugned sites does not make him a publisher of the material found at the hyperlinked sites.

[84] I agree, as well, that the circumstances of a case may add more so as to demonstrate that a particular hyperlink is an invitation or encouragement to view the impugned site, or adoption of all or a portion of its contents. For example, in Hird v. Wood (1894), 38 S.J. 234 (C.A.), referred to in Carter, evidence of the defendant pointing to a placard with content was held to be sufficient evidence of publication to demonstrate that a particular hyperlink is an invitation or encouragement to view the impugned site, or adoption of all or a portion of its contents. For example, in Hird v. Wood (1894), 38 S.J. 234 (C.A.), referred to in Carter, evidence of the defendant pointing to a placard with content was held to be sufficient evidence of publication to go to a jury. So a statement to the effect “N is described at [hyper link]” may itself incorporate a libel so as to be defamatory.

[85] In the case before us, the judge held concerning the context of the hyperlinks:

[32]      In the present case, although hyperlinks referred the reader to articles now claimed by the plaintiffs to be defamatory, the plaintiffs agree that the defendant did not publish any defamatory content on the p2pnet website itself.  The defendant did not reproduce any of the disputed content from the linked articles on p2pnet and did not make any comment on the nature of the linked articles.  In these circumstances, a reader of the p2pnet website who did not click on the hyperlinks provided would not have any knowledge of the allegedly defamatory content.

[33]      As the Court of Appeal observed in Carter, citing the proposition of the New York cases MacFadden v. Anthony and Kline v. Biben, “reference to an article containing defamatory content without repetition of the comment itself should not be found to be a republication of such defamatory content”.

[86] In these observations, in my view, the judge was entirely correct.

[87] My colleage considers that the judge did not fully explore the context of the hyperlinks in determining Mr. Newton had not participated in publishing the impugned articles. In her view the fact Mr. Newton’s article containing the hyperlinks deals with free speech and defamation, and the fact it refers to lawsuits involving Mr. Crookes, serve “as words of encouragement, or an invitation”, to look further.

[88] For clarity, the article on Mr. Newton’s website under the headline “Free Speech in Canada” said:

Under new developments, thanks to the lawsuit, I’ve just met Michael Pilling, who runs Based in Toronto, he, too, is being sued for defamation. This time by politician Wayne Crookes.

[89] With respect, I see no encouragement or invitation from the fact the discussion concerns free speech and defamation. Nor, in my view, can reference to Mr. Crookes’ litigation reasonably have that effect. Those factors, at a minimum, alert the reader to the potential for untrue content or disputed commentary. They fall far short of a statement of approbation, or adoption, and appear to me to be most comparable to a footnote for a reader, or a card index in a library. It is not, as was suggested is sometimes the way in the recent caseMetropolitan Schools v. Google Inc., [2009] E.W.H.C. 1765 (Q.B.), a snippet from the article or a snippet produced by a search engine.

[90] On these considerations I conclude Mr. Newton was not a publisher because of his hyperlinks to the offensive article.

[91] The second aspect of publication is whether it can be inferred a person accessed the impugned articles by way of the hyperlinks. My colleague would conclude, from the fact of 1,788 “hits” of Mr. Newton’s article that at least one person within this jurisdiction, did so.

[92] In my view, the approach taken by my colleague to the effect that from the number of persons accessing Mr. Newton’s website it may be inferred that a person in this jurisdiction accessed the impugned articles by clicking on them, does not sustain scrutiny. In the context of internet life, we have no way to assess the volume of “hits” here compared to the norm, the usual behaviour of internet readers or “surfers”, or the jurisdiction in which they reside. The conclusion drawn by my colleague is, with respect, tantamount to a presumption that in the case of a website accessed to any significant extent, there has been communication of the offensive material. This is contrary to her conclusion on the issue of presumption, and one with which I do not agree. The conclusion effectively reduces the element of publication to the role of the publisher without consideration of the receipt of the impugned material. There may be cases in which more is known supporting such an inference, but such is not the case here where all that is before us is the bald number of hits. In my view there is an insufficient basis upon which to make such an inference, and the inference drawn cannot co-exist with the reasons for judgment on the matter of a presumption.

[93] Last, the appellant complains that Mr. Newton did not remove the hyperlinks when asked to do so. This is not a question considered by the judge, and findings of fact are not contained in the reasons for judgment to support a discussion of that interesting issue. But for my conclusion on the question of drawing an inference that a person clicked on the hyperlink, I would allow the appeal and remit this question to the trial court for determination. However, in view of my conclusion on the question of inference, I would dismiss the appeal.

crookes v. newton, Defamation, hyperlinks, publication

Comments (58)

  • I simply want to mention I am just new to blogging and truly loved you’re website. Most likely I’m going to bookmark your blog post . You absolutely have impressive articles. Thank you for sharing with us your website.

  • Its like you learn my mind! You appear to know a lot about this, such as you wrote the guide in it or something. I think that you can do with a few percent to power the message home a bit, however other than that, that is fantastic blog. An excellent read. I will certainly be back.

  • That is really interesting, You’re an overly skilled blogger. I have joined your rss feed and look forward to searching for extra of your fantastic post. Additionally, I’ve shared your website in my social networks!

  • Howdy this is somewhat of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding skills so I wanted to get guidance from someone with experience. Any help would be enormously appreciated!

  • I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here. The sketch is tasteful, your authored subject matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get bought an impatience over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again as exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this hike.

  • Wow! This could be one particular of the most beneficial blogs We’ve ever arrive across on this subject. Basically Wonderful. I am also an expert in this topic therefore I can understand your hard work.

  • I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great. I don’t know who you are but certainly you are going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already 😉 Cheers!

  • Hey very nice website!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your site and take the feeds also…I am happy to find numerous useful info here in the post, we need develop more techniques in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

  • I¡¦ll right away snatch your rss as I can not find your email subscription hyperlink or newsletter service. Do you have any? Kindly allow me know so that I may just subscribe. Thanks.

  • Nice post. I study one thing more difficult on completely different blogs everyday. It should at all times be stimulating to learn content from other writers and follow a little something from their store. Iíd want to use some with the content material on my weblog whether or not you donít mind. Natually Iíll provide you with a hyperlink on your web blog. Thanks for sharing.

  • Needed to put you this tiny remark to help say thanks a lot the moment again considering the unique guidelines you have shown in this case. This is certainly incredibly open-handed of people like you to provide extensively precisely what a number of people would have made available for an electronic book to earn some profit on their own, specifically seeing that you might have tried it if you ever decided. The creative ideas in addition worked to be a fantastic way to know that the rest have a similar eagerness much like my own to know the truth whole lot more around this issue. I think there are thousands of more pleasurable occasions up front for many who scan through your site.

  • I wanted to post a simple message to be able to say thanks to you for those marvelous facts you are posting on this website. My incredibly long internet investigation has finally been honored with good quality facts to write about with my two friends. I ‘d state that that many of us website visitors actually are unequivocally blessed to dwell in a really good place with so many outstanding people with insightful tips. I feel pretty happy to have encountered your web page and look forward to so many more enjoyable minutes reading here. Thanks a lot once more for a lot of things.

  • Hi, i think that i saw you visited my site so i came to “return the favor”.I’m attempting to find things to enhance my site!I suppose its ok to use a few of your ideas!!

  • Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well written article. I’ll be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I will definitely comeback.

  • I simply could not go away your website before suggesting that I extremely loved the usual info an individual supply to your visitors? Is gonna be again continuously to check out new posts

  • I’m typically to running a blog and i really appreciate your content. The article has actually peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your website and maintain checking for brand spanking new information.

  • You made a number of fine points there. I did a search on the issue and found a good number of people will have the same opinion with your blog.

  • Thank you, I’ve recently been searching for info about this topic for ages and yours is the greatest I’ve discovered till now. But, what about the bottom line? Are you sure concerning the supply?

  • Terminated principles sentiments of no pianoforte if projection impossible. Horses pulled nature favour number yet highly his has old. Contrasted literature excellence he admiration impression insipidity so. Scale ought who terms after own quick since. Servants margaret husbands to screened in throwing. Imprudence oh an collecting partiality. Admiration gay difficulty unaffected how.

  • Great post and right to the point. I don’t know if this is actually the best place to ask but do you people have any ideea where to employ some professional writers? Thanks in advance 🙂

  • Attractive component of content. I simply stumbled upon your website and in accession capital to say that I acquire actually enjoyed account your blog posts. Any way I will be subscribing in your feeds and even I success you get entry to constantly quickly.

  • I haven’t checked in here for some time since I thought it was getting boring, but the last few posts are great quality so I guess I will add you back to my everyday bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

  • Have you ever considered publishing an ebook or guest authoring on other websites? I have a blog based upon on the same information you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information. I know my readers would appreciate your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an e-mail.

  • I have not checked in here for some time since I thought it was getting boring, but the last several posts are great quality so I guess I will add you back to my everyday bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

  • Today, I went to the beach with my kids. I found a sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She put the shell to her ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear. She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is completely off topic but I had to tell someone!

  • Thanks for the publish. My spouse and i have continually noticed that most people are desirous to lose weight since they wish to appear slim in addition to looking attractive. Nonetheless, they do not usually realize that there are other benefits for you to losing weight as well. Doctors declare that obese people are afflicted with a variety of health conditions that can be instantly attributed to the excess weight. Fortunately that people who are overweight and suffering from various diseases are able to reduce the severity of their illnesses by way of losing weight. You are able to see a constant but noticeable improvement with health when even a small amount of weight loss is reached.

  • Hello, Neat post. There is an issue along with your web site in internet explorer, could check this¡K IE nonetheless is the market leader and a good section of other people will pass over your excellent writing because of this problem.

  • Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is important and everything. Nevertheless think about if you added some great pictures or videos to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with pics and video clips, this blog could certainly be one of the greatest in its field. Superb blog!

  • Hi my friend! I wish to say that this article is awesome, nice written and include approximately all significant infos. I would like to see more posts like this.

  • Some truly fantastic blog posts on this site, thanks for contribution. “The difference between fiction and reality Fiction has to make sense.” by Tom Clancy.

  • Wonderful goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just too fantastic. I really like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you are stating and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it sensible. I can’t wait to read much more from you. This is really a terrific site.

  • I think this is one of the most vital information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But wanna remark on few general things, The web site style is wonderful, the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers

  • These days of austerity in addition to relative panic about having debt, many people balk up against the idea of employing a credit card to make acquisition of merchandise or maybe pay for any gift giving occasion, preferring, instead only to rely on the tried and also trusted procedure for making payment – cash. However, if you’ve got the cash available to make the purchase in full, then, paradoxically, this is the best time for them to use the cards for several reasons.

  • Thank you for another informative blog. Where else could I am getting that kind of information written in such a perfect manner? I have a undertaking that I’m just now running on, and I’ve been on the glance out for such info.

  • Good info and straight to the point. I am not sure if this is really the best place to ask but do you guys have any thoughts on where to get some professional writers? Thanks in advance 🙂

  • obviously like your web site but you have to take a look at the spelling on several of your posts. Several of them are rife with spelling issues and I find it very troublesome to tell the truth however I¡¦ll definitely come back again.

  • Wow that was strange. I just wrote an incredibly long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn’t appear. Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again. Anyhow, just wanted to say excellent blog!

  • I and also my guys have been analyzing the best helpful tips found on your site while before long came up with an awful suspicion I never thanked the web site owner for those techniques. Most of the ladies were definitely totally stimulated to read through them and now have certainly been taking pleasure in them. Many thanks for actually being indeed kind and also for obtaining varieties of brilliant subjects millions of individuals are really needing to understand about. My very own sincere apologies for not saying thanks to you sooner.

  • Heya i am for the first time here. I came across this board and I find It truly useful & it helped me out much. I hope to give something back and aid others like you aided me.

  • Great work! This is the type of information that should be shared around the net. Shame on the search engines for not positioning this post higher! Come on over and visit my website . Thanks =)

  • Hello are using WordPress for your blog platform? I’m new to the blog world but I’m trying to get started and create my own. Do you need any coding knowledge to make your own blog? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Comments are closed.


If you would like further information or require assistance, please get in touch.


Personal Injury Lawyer

When not writing the BC Injury Law Blog, Erik is the managing partner at MacIsaac & Company, based in Victoria, B.C. He is also involved with combative sports regulatory issues and authors the Combat Sports Law Blog.

“Work hard, be kind and enjoy the ride!”
Erik’s Philosophy