Welcome CFAX Listeners – Dog Bite Injury Law in BC


Earlier today I had the pleasure of being interviewed by CFAX Radio with respect to lawsuits for compensation as a result of Dog Bite injuries in British Columbia.
For those of you looking for more on this area of law you can click here to read a 2004 decision which provides the following useful overview of the legal principles of scienter and negligence which were discussed in today’s interview:

[] The common law doctrine of scienter differs from negligence in that if the conditions for scienter are found, the liability is absolute and does not depend upon proof of negligence.  The requirements for establishing scienter were described by the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Janota-Bzowska v. Lewis[1997] B.C.J. No. 2053.  In that case the Court observed at para. 9 that the owner of a dog can be found liable for an attack in two ways:

First, the owner may be held liable under the doctrine of scienter and second, the owner may be held liable for negligence.  It is important to keep the two separate as they often become intertwined.  They are, however, not the same.

The Court went on at para. 20 to describe the doctrine of scienter in this way:

The law with respect to the doctrine of scienter is relatively clear.  The owner of a dog which bites another will not be liable simply for being the owner.  Liability will only attach under the doctrine if the three conditions set forth in the Neville decision have been satisfied.  In other words, the plaintiff (not the defendant) must establish:

i)   that the defendant was the owner of the dog;

ii)  that the dog had manifested a propensity to cause the type of harm occasioned; and

iii) that the owner knew of that propensity.

Some provinces now have legislation which modifies the common law of scienter but, since the repeal of the Animals Act in 1981, British Columbia does not and the common law applies untrammelled by statutory enactment.

[] At para. 23 of the judgment, the Court of Appeal described the requirements for negligence in the context of a dog attack in this way:

To succeed in an action based on negligence against Holtzman, the plaintiff must prove, on a balance of probabilities that:

(a)  Holtzman knew, or ought to have known, that Boomer was likely to create a risk of injury to third persons, including the plaintiff; and

(b)  Holtzman failed to take reasonable care to prevent such injury.  …

[] It can be seen that there are two important differences between liability based on scienter and liability based on negligence.  If the requirements of scienter are established, liability is absolute, and the plaintiff is not required to show breach of a standard of care.  On the other hand, to establish scienter, the plaintiff must show both that the dog manifested a propensity to cause the type of harm which occurred and also that the owner knew of that propensity.  It thus appears that for scienter, the mental element is based on a subjective test:  the plaintiff must establish that the defendant actually knew of the dog’s propensity to cause the relevant type of harm.  This is in contrast to liability based on negligence, where an objective test applies.  That is, for negligence it is sufficient if the defendant knew or ought to have known that the dog was likely to create a risk of injury to third persons, and failed to take reasonable care to prevent the injuries.

Dog Bite Cases, Mr. Justice Ehrcke, Prasad v. Wepruk, Scienter

Comments (15)

  • I just want to say I am just newbie to blogs and absolutely enjoyed you’re blog. Probably I’m going to bookmark your blog . You really have superb well written articles. Appreciate it for sharing with us your blog.

  • Good day! Would you mind if I share your blog with my twitter group? There’s a lot of folks that I think would really appreciate your content. Please let me know. Thanks

  • Its like you read my mind! You appear to know so much about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you can do with some pics to drive the message home a bit, but other than that, this is magnificent blog. A fantastic read. I will definitely be back.

  • I’ve learned many important things as a result of your post. I will also like to say that there may be situation where you will apply for a loan and never need a co-signer such as a Government Student Support Loan. When you are getting a loan through a classic lender then you need to be prepared to have a co-signer ready to assist you. The lenders will probably base their decision on the few elements but the greatest will be your credit history. There are some financial institutions that will as well look at your job history and make up your mind based on that but in most cases it will hinge on your credit score.

  • When I initially commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get several e-mails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove people from that service? Appreciate it!

  • excellent put up, very informative. I’m wondering why the other experts of this sector do not understand this. You must continue your writing. I’m sure, you have a huge readers’ base already!

  • I like what you guys are up also. Such intelligent work and reporting! Carry on the excellent works guys I have incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it’ll improve the value of my web site 🙂

  • I really like your writing style, fantastic info, appreciate it for putting up :D. “God save me from my friends. I can protect myself from my enemies.” by Claude Louis Hector de Villars.

  • Hello there, just was aware of your weblog via Google, and located that it is truly informative. I’m going to watch out for brussels. I will be grateful for those who proceed this in future. Lots of folks can be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  • I’m not certain where you’re getting your info, however great topic. I must spend a while studying more or working out more. Thanks for magnificent information I was on the lookout for this info for my mission.

  • I’m curious to find out what blog platform you’re using? I’m having some small security issues with my latest blog and I would like to find something more safeguarded. Do you have any recommendations?

  • Hey There. I discovered your blog the use of msn. This is an extremely well written article. I’ll make sure to bookmark it and return to learn extra of your useful info. Thank you for the post. I will definitely return.

  • I have learned quite a few important things via your post. I might also like to mention that there might be situation that you will obtain a loan and do not need a cosigner such as a Government Student Support Loan. But when you are getting credit through a common banker then you need to be ready to have a co-signer ready to assist you to. The lenders will certainly base that decision on a few variables but the greatest will be your credit history. There are some loan providers that will additionally look at your work history and make a decision based on that but in most cases it will hinge on your scores.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Contact

If you would like further information or require assistance, please get in touch.

ERIK
MAGRAKEN

Personal Injury Lawyer

When not writing the BC Injury Law Blog, Erik is the managing partner at MacIsaac & Company, based in Victoria, B.C. He is also involved with combative sports regulatory issues and authors the Combat Sports Law Blog.

“Work hard, be kind and enjoy the ride!”
Erik’s Philosophy

Disclaimer