BC Personal Injury Claims and Document Disclosure

Very important reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Court of Appeal dealing with the duties of counsel when it comes to listing privileged documents in BC Supreme Court Lawsuits.
In today’s case (Stone v. Ellerman) the Plaintiff was injured in a 2002 BC car crash.  Her case proceeded to trial and she was awarded almost $700,000 in damages.  The defendants appealed and today the BC Court of Appeal ordered a new trial on the basis that the trial was ‘fundamentally flawed when, partway through the plaintiff’s evidence in chief, and over the objection of the defence, the plaintiff was permitted to use a pain journal‘.   The reason why this created a ‘fundamentally flawed‘ trial was because the pain journal was not properly identified by the plaintiff’s lawyer.
Rule 26 deals with disclosure obligations in most BC Supreme Court lawsuits and subrule 26(2.1) requires that “the nature of any document for which privilege from production is claimed must be described in a manner that, without revealing information that is privileged, will enable parties to assess the validity of the claim of privilge‘.
In the course of the claim the Plaintiff’s lawyer advised her to keep a pain journal, something often done in personal injury cases.  In listing the document as privileged it was described as “notes and documents, correspondence, minutes of evidence, memoranda being the work product of plaintiff’s legal advisers“. The trial judge held that this document was not properly disclosed, however, permitted the Plaintiff’s memory to be ‘refreshed’ at trial with this document.
The Defendants appealed and succeeded.  In granting a new trial the BC Court of Appeal gave the most comprehensive summary of this area of the law that I’m aware of.  Specifically, the court said the following with respect to lawyers disclosure obligations of privileged documents under Rule 26:

[21] The first question to be addressed is whether the pain journal was adequately described for purposes of Rule 26(2.1) by “notes and documents, correspondence, minutes of evidence, memoranda being the work product of plaintiff’s legal advisers”.

[22] It is clear that it was not. Nothing in that description would “enable other parties to assess the validity of the claim of privilege” (Rule 26(2.1)), or to anticipate that anything like a pain journal existed among the “notes and documents”, even in the most general terms.

[23] The information that must be included in the description of a document over which privilege is claimed will vary depending upon the document, but it must be sufficiently described so that if the claim is challenged it can be considered by a judge in chambers: Babcock v. Canada (Attorney General), 2004 BCSC 1311, 246 D.L.R. (4th) 549, citing Visa International Service Assn. v. Block Bros. Realty Ltd. (1983), 64 B.C.L.R. (2d) 390 (C.A.).

[24] In Saric v. Toronto-Dominion Bank, 1999 BCCA 459, Mr. Justice Hall, in chambers, cited Shaughnessy Golf and Country Club v. Uniguard Services Ltd. and Chahal (1986), 1 B.C.L.R. (2d) 309 (C.A.), for the proposition that the grounds for privilege have to be established in respect of each document which is said to be privileged.  He added (at para. 12) “a litigant, (and presumably the court), has to have some proper basis upon which to determine issues of privilege as they relate to documents”.

[25] It has been held that since Rule 26(2.1) came into force in mid-1998 the “bundling” of documents under a broad description is no longer sufficient and that each document must be listed separately.  In Leung v. Hanna (1999), 68 B.C.L.R. (3d) 360 (S.C.), solicitor-client privilege was claimed over documents that were described as “documents marked P3 [through P10], the same having been initialled by the handling solicitor”. Mr. Justice Burnyeat found that each document had been listed separately as the new sub-rule required.  He found that the descriptions themselves otherwise satisfied the requirements articulated in Hodgkinson v. Simms (1988), 33 B.C.L.R. (2d) 129, under the old rule, which permitted quite generic descriptions in favour of protecting privileged information. Burnyeat J. held that such descriptions – now of individual documents – remained sufficient under the new rule.

[26] In Bajic v. Friesen, 2006 BCSC 1290, a master in chambers explained the decision in Leung this way:

[3]        It is clear from the decision of Mr. Justice Burnyeat that the sanctity, if you will, of solicitor/client privilege in his mind trumps any attempt to describe documents in part 3 such that they provide any conceivable understanding to the other party as to the nature of the document. It would appear it then forces a party concerned with the description or lack of same in part 3 to bring an application to the court which then leaves the judge or master hearing the matter to review the document and then conclude whether or not it is appropriately within part 3.

[27] Some authority supports the proposition that where the privilege claimed is not solicitor-client privilege but rather litigation privilege, as in this case, the premium placed on protecting the information is lower and the description must be more detailed to facilitate challenge.  In Hetherington v. Loo, 2007 BCSC 129, Master Caldwell distinguished Leung v. Hanna on the basis that it dealt exclusively with solicitor-client privilege.  He reasoned as follows:

[8]        …The present case deals with a claim of privilege based upon the “dominant purpose of litigation” test and protection. While information such as the date and author’s identity may well be protected from disclosure under a claim of solicitor-client privilege, such protection is not necessarily afforded claims of privilege based upon the dominant purpose test. The latter protection is less absolute, more fact driven and subject to challenge. In the recent case of Blank v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [2006] S.C.J. No. 39, Fish J. said at [paragraph] 60:

the litigation privilege should be viewed as a limited exception to the principle of full disclosure and not as an equal partner of the broadly interpreted solicitor-client privilege. The dominant purpose test is more compatible with the contemporary trend favouring increased disclosure.

[9]        And at [paragraph] 61:

While the solicitor-client privilege has been strengthened, reaffirmed and elevated in recent years, the litigation privilege has had, on the contrary, to weather the trend toward mutual and reciprocal disclosure which is the hallmark of the judicial process.

[10]      In order that proper assessment may be made as to the propriety of a claim of litigation or dominant purpose privilege it is necessary that sufficient particulars of the documents be given. In most cases dealing with documents involving adjusters files and certainly in this case, particulars as to date and author must be provided. When dealing with interview notes, transcripts, and statements, it may also be necessary to identify if not the actual subject, at least the category of subject (e.g. eyewitnesses, home-care worker, etc.) involved.

[28] Snow v. Friesen, 2008 BCSC 1664, is to the same effect.

[29] In this case, the pain journal is properly to be treated as within the lawyer’s brief, or litigation privilege.  The description in the plaintiff’s affidavit of documents failed to provide any information that would have made the defendants aware of a document in the “category of subject” of the pain journal or enabled them to assess the validity of the claim of privilege.  It follows that for the purposes of Rule 26(14) the plaintiff failed to make discovery of the pain journal “as required by this rule”.

[30] Nondisclosure notwithstanding, the judge retained the discretion to permit the use of the pain journal for the purposes of the plaintiff’s examination-in-chief.  Factors basic to the exercise of this discretion are whether the defendants would suffer prejudice if the use of the journal was permitted, and whether there was a reasonable explanation for the plaintiff’s failure to disclose it.

[31] Other factors relevant to the exercise of the discretion are whether excluding the document would prevent the determination of the issue on its merits: Hoole v. Advani, [1996] B.C.J. No. 522; and whether, in the circumstances of the case, the ends of justice require that the document be admitted: Jones, Gable & Co. v. Price (1977), 5 B.C.L.R. 103; Wu v. Sun, 2006 BCSC 1890; and Adamson v. Charity, 2007 BCSC 671.

[32] In Carol v. Gabriel (1997), 14 C.P.C. (4th) 376, Mr. Justice Henderson excluded a surreptitiously recorded videotape of an independent medical examination.  He said:

[9]        A party tendering a previously undisclosed document must establish to the court’s satisfaction a justification for the failure to abide by Rule 26(14). The question of whether the opposite party will be prejudiced by the admission of the document is always relevant but is not, in and of itself, decisive. Even in cases where no prejudice will ensue from the admission in evidence of the document, it will be excluded unless there is a reasonable justification for the earlier failure to disclose it. To hold otherwise would be to dilute the disclosure obligation and tempt counsel to refrain from disclosing in situations where they do not expect any prejudice to result.

[33] Mr. Justice Henderson found that the defendant would not be prejudiced in any way by the admission of the videotape, because the alleged discrepancies between the tape and the report were minor and would not have affected his assessment of the doctor’s credibility.  However, he ruled the tape inadmissible in the absence of any reasonable justification for failing to disclose it earlier.

[34] This approach has been followed in subsequent cases: see Ball v. Gap (Canada) Inc., 2001 BCSC 824, 8 C.P.C. (5th) 258; Golden Capital Securities Ltd. v. Holmes, 2002 BCSC 516; Sturzenegger (c.o.b. Zurich Trucking) v. K. Peters Industries Northern Ltd., 2003 YKSC 72; Kursar v. BCAA Insurance Corp., 2006 BCSC 586; and Wu v. Sun, 2006 BCSC 1890.

[35] It appears that the judge failed entirely to consider whether there was any reasonable explanation for the plaintiff’s failure to comply with the disclosure rule.  The law leaves no doubt that this is a central factor to be considered, nor any doubt that the fact that a document may be subject to lawyers’ brief privilege or litigation privilege does not provide a reasonable explanation for failing to disclose it in accordance with the requirements of Rule 26: Hoole v. Advani, and Ball v. Gap (Canada) Inc. (both supra).

[36] In Golden Capital Securities Ltd. v. Holmes (supra), the plaintiff claimed litigation privilege over some tape recordings made by a witness to a conversation between the witness and the defendants.  The tapes and transcripts thereof were not provided by the plaintiff to defendants’ counsel until just before the witness appeared to testify, some seven days after the trial commenced.  The plaintiff sought to have them admitted into evidence.

[37] Applying Carol v. Gabriel (supra), and noting that the burden was on the plaintiff, the judge sought a reasonable explanation for the lack of timely disclosure.  The judge rejected as a reasonable explanation the claim that the recordings were subject to litigation privilege.  While prejudice was not required to be found in order to rule the documents inadmissible, the judge found that in this case there was potential prejudice.  The defendants missed the opportunity to examine the recordings, prepare objections that might be proper, discover and respond to any problems with the recordings themselves and were unable to cross-examine witnesses who had already testified about the content of the recordings.  The judge noted that the content of the recordings had been the subject of the witness’s testimony so the plaintiff was not deprived of the opportunity to put that aspect of his case before the court.  The witness would have had to testify from memory had he not recorded the conversations or had the tapes been lost, and so the plaintiff had the benefit of the tapes to the extent of having had his memory refreshed by them.  The tapes were excluded from evidence.

[38] In my view, there was in the case at bar significant prejudice to the defence in being refused the opportunity to make a full and reasoned objection to the late production of this document.  Had the document been disclosed in a timely way, it would have undoubtedly affected defence counsel’s preparation for trial.

[39] If the pain journal had been identified in the plaintiff’s list of documents in a manner that complied with Rule 26(2.1), the defence would have been able “to assess the validity of the claim for privilege”.  If not satisfied that the document was properly protected by the claim of litigation privilege, the defence could have applied under Rule 26(8) to compel production of the document for inspection.  Upon being satisfied that the document was not privileged, the court could have ordered its production for inspection and copying under Rule 26(10). If the claim for privilege had been maintained, the defence would have known of the document’s existence, if not its content. Knowledge of its existence might well have affected settlement negotiations and would have enabled defence counsel to anticipate the document’s possible presentation at trial.

[40] With respect to contrary opinion, it is no answer to non-compliance with Rule 26 to argue that the pain journal was not used for an improper purpose at trial, or that the defence chose to cross-examine on its contents.  Those considerations are quite irrelevant to the questions of whether there was non-compliance with the rule, whether there was prejudice to the defence, and whether the judge exercised his discretion judicially.

[41] Nor is it any answer to suggest that the plaintiff was not required to produce the document until privilege was waived.  That argument ignores entirely the other provisions of Rule 26, which enable opposing counsel to challenge the claim for privilege before trial.

[42] The object of the discovery rules is to prevent trial by ambush.  The object of the Rules in general is “… to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every proceeding on its merits” (Rule 1(5)).  Discovery of documents that fails to comply with the Rules is antithetical to these ends.

[43] The judge appears to have given little or no consideration to the prejudice suffered by the defence.

[44] It is unfortunate that the trial judge did not avail himself of defence counsel’s offer to provide authorities on how the judge should exercise his discretion in the circumstances.  Defence counsel was obviously taken by surprise at the production of the pain journal in the midst of the plaintiff’s evidence in chief.  It was entirely reasonable for defence counsel to seek an opportunity to research and consider the law before making submissions to the court, and it may well have been of considerable assistance to the court.

[45] The pain journal proved to be of central importance to the plaintiff’s evidence.  As the judge observed in ruling its use permissible “her memory of events isn’t good” and without something to prompt her she “is unable to give me any of the detail that makes up the total picture.  What she gives me is conclusory opinions”.

[46] The proposition that keeping a pain journal on counsel’s advice is sufficiently common practice as to exempt such a journal from the disclosure rules is unsupported by any authority. The judge’s suggestion that one ought to assume that a pain diary is being kept in all personal injury litigation is also inconsistent with the fact that the burden of providing a reasonable explanation falls squarely on the party who has failed to make disclosure in accordance with the rules.

[47] It may be apparent in retrospect that it was necessary for the plaintiff to refer to her pain diary in order to recall events long past, and it is arguable that to have prevented her from doing so may have interfered with the proper decision of the issues at trial on their merits and with full information.  However, permitting use of the document with no notice to the defence gave the plaintiff an unfair advantage.

[48] One cannot say with certainty that the judge would have reached a different conclusion on the use of the pain diary if he had considered all relevant factors, in particular whether there was a reasonable explanation for the delay in its disclosure.  However, the simple claim that the document was subject to litigation privilege is not an explanation, and no other explanation was presented to the judge.

[49] In the absence of a reasonable explanation for the late disclosure, and without an adequate consideration of the issue of prejudice, the judge ought not to have permitted the use of the diary.

[50] In my respectful opinion, permission to use the document in the circumstances described amounted to a miscarriage of justice.

[51] I would allow the appeal, set aside the judgment and order a new trial.

bc personal injury cases, icbc injury claims, litigatioin privilege, privilege, Stone v. Ellerman

Comments (104)

  • I just want to say I’m all new to weblog and truly enjoyed you’re web page. Very likely I’m want to bookmark your blog post . You surely come with terrific stories. Regards for sharing with us your blog.

  • Hi, Neat post. There is an issue together with your web site in internet explorer, could check this¡K IE nonetheless is the marketplace leader and a big part of folks will leave out your wonderful writing due to this problem.

  • Undeniably believe that which you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the net the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get irked while people consider worries that they plainly don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

  • Hmm it appears like your website ate my first comment (it was super long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I had written and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I too am an aspiring blog writer but I’m still new to the whole thing. Do you have any helpful hints for rookie blog writers? I’d definitely appreciate it.

  • Great beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your site, how can i subscribe for a blog site? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear concept

  • Enjoyed looking at this, very good stuff, thankyou . “The hunger for love is much more difficult to remove than the hunger for bread.” by Mother Theresa.

  • Good blog! I really love how it is simple on my eyes and the data are well written. I am wondering how I might be notified when a new post has been made. I have subscribed to your RSS feed which must do the trick! Have a great day!

  • Have you ever thought about including a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is fundamental and all. But imagine if you added some great images or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and clips, this site could certainly be one of the most beneficial in its niche. Amazing blog!

  • Many thanks to you for sharing these kinds of wonderful posts. In addition, the right travel plus medical insurance plan can often eliminate those concerns that come with touring abroad. A medical crisis can before long become expensive and that’s certain to quickly put a financial burden on the family finances. Setting up in place the great travel insurance program prior to setting off is well worth the time and effort. Thanks a lot

  • Hi, Neat post. There’s a problem along with your website in internet explorer, would check this… IE nonetheless is the market chief and a good element of people will leave out your magnificent writing due to this problem.

  • I’ll right away seize your rss as I can’t to find your e-mail subscription link or e-newsletter service. Do you have any? Please let me realize in order that I could subscribe. Thanks.

  • Hello there, just become aware of your blog thru Google, and found that it’s truly informative. I’m going to watch out for brussels. I’ll be grateful when you continue this in future. Lots of folks shall be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  • Throughout this great pattern of things you actually receive a B- with regard to hard work. Exactly where you actually confused everybody was on all the specifics. As as the maxim goes, details make or break the argument.. And that couldn’t be much more true right here. Having said that, permit me inform you just what exactly did give good results. The article (parts of it) is extremely engaging and this is possibly why I am making an effort to comment. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. 2nd, despite the fact that I can certainly notice a leaps in reason you come up with, I am definitely not sure of how you appear to unite your points which help to make the final result. For now I will, no doubt yield to your issue but hope in the foreseeable future you actually link the facts much better.

  • hey there and thank you for your information – I have certainly picked up something new from right here. I did however expertise a few technical issues using this site, as I experienced to reload the website a lot of times previous to I could get it to load correctly. I had been wondering if your hosting is OK? Not that I am complaining, but slow loading instances times will sometimes affect your placement in google and can damage your high-quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I am adding this RSS to my email and can look out for a lot more of your respective fascinating content. Make sure you update this again very soon..

  • Normally I do not read article on blogs, however I wish to say that this write-up very forced me to try and do so! Your writing taste has been surprised me. Thanks, very nice article.

  • I have not checked in here for some time since I thought it was getting boring, but the last few posts are good quality so I guess I’ll add you back to my daily bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

  • Hello, i read your blog from time to time and i own a similar one and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam remarks? If so how do you reduce it, any plugin or anything you can advise? I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so any assistance is very much appreciated.

  • Undeniably consider that which you said. Your favourite reason seemed to be at the net the easiest factor to be mindful of. I say to you, I certainly get irked while other folks consider issues that they plainly don’t recognize about. You managed to hit the nail upon the highest and outlined out the whole thing with no need side-effects , folks can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thank you

  • It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d most certainly donate to this excellent blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to new updates and will share this site with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

  • My partner and I absolutely love your blog and find nearly all of your post’s to be just what I’m looking for. Would you offer guest writers to write content for yourself? I wouldn’t mind producing a post or elaborating on many of the subjects you write concerning here. Again, awesome web site!

  • Very great post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and wished to say that I’ve truly loved surfing around your weblog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing in your feed and I am hoping you write again very soon!

  • Its such as you read my thoughts! You seem to know a lot about this, like you wrote the e-book in it or something. I feel that you just can do with a few percent to force the message house a little bit, however instead of that, this is fantastic blog. A great read. I will definitely be back.

  • I simply needed to say thanks once more. I am not sure what I would have sorted out in the absence of the type of creative ideas contributed by you concerning that subject. It was actually a real daunting difficulty in my circumstances, however , being able to view a new expert way you resolved it made me to leap over gladness. I am grateful for this work and even wish you really know what an amazing job you are carrying out instructing the mediocre ones through the use of your web site. More than likely you haven’t met all of us.

  • Wonderful blog! I found it while surfing around on Yahoo News. Do you have any suggestions on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Appreciate it

  • I’m impressed, I need to say. Actually rarely do I encounter a weblog that’s each educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you have hit the nail on the head. Your idea is excellent; the issue is something that not sufficient people are speaking intelligently about. I’m very happy that I stumbled throughout this in my search for something regarding this.

  • Thanks for the helpful content. It is also my belief that mesothelioma cancer has an incredibly long latency time, which means that symptoms of the disease might not emerge until eventually 30 to 50 years after the original exposure to asbestos fiber. Pleural mesothelioma, that’s the most common type and affects the area around the lungs, might cause shortness of breath, chest muscles pains, including a persistent cough, which may produce coughing up maintain.

  • Hi, Neat post. There is an issue together with your web site in internet explorer, might check this… IE nonetheless is the marketplace leader and a good portion of other people will leave out your excellent writing because of this problem.

  • Is education residence conveying so so. Suppose shyness say ten behaved morning had. Any unsatiable assistance compliment occasional too reasonably advantages. Unpleasing has ask acceptance partiality alteration understood two. Worth no tiled my at house added. Married he hearing am it totally removal. Remove but suffer wanted his lively length. Moonlight two applauded conveying end direction old principle but. Are expenses distance weddings perceive strongly who age domestic.

  • I like the helpful information you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your blog and check again here frequently. I am quite sure I will learn a lot of new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next!

  • I have observed that in the world these days, video games will be the latest rage with children of all ages. Occasionally it may be unattainable to drag your children away from the games. If you want the very best of both worlds, there are numerous educational gaming activities for kids. Good post.

  • Every as soon as inside a when we decide on blogs that we read. Listed below would be the newest web-sites that we choose.

  • Hmm is anyone else encountering problems with the images on this blog loading? I’m trying to determine if its a problem on my end or if it’s the blog. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

  • I am really impressed with your writing skills as neatly as with the layout to your blog. Is this a paid topic or did you customize it yourself? Anyway stay up the nice high quality writing, it is rare to see a nice blog like this one nowadays..

  • You could certainly see your skills within the paintings you write. The sector hopes for even more passionate writers like you who aren’t afraid to say how they believe. All the time go after your heart.

  • I keep listening to the news lecture about getting boundless online grant applications so I have been looking around for the best site to get one. Could you advise me please, where could i acquire some?

  • Hello, Neat post. There’s a problem along with your site in web explorer, could test this¡K IE nonetheless is the marketplace chief and a huge component to people will leave out your wonderful writing due to this problem.

  • Amazing blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A design like yours with a few simple adjustements would really make my blog stand out. Please let me know where you got your theme. Cheers

  • I will right away grab your rss feed as I can’t find your email subscription link or e-newsletter service. Do you have any? Please let me know in order that I could subscribe. Thanks.

  • I do consider all the ideas you have offered in your post. They’re very convincing and can definitely work. Nonetheless, the posts are very quick for starters. Could you please prolong them a bit from subsequent time? Thanks for the post.

  • I have to convey my affection for your generosity giving support to visitors who absolutely need help on this one theme. Your real dedication to getting the message all around ended up being particularly beneficial and has surely enabled those just like me to achieve their endeavors. Your entire important instruction indicates a whole lot a person like me and much more to my office workers. Thanks a lot; from all of us.

  • I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own weblog and was curious what all is required to get set up? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very web savvy so I’m not 100 certain. Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks

  • Thanks for your own effort on this web page. Debby delights in making time for research and it’s obvious why. I notice all concerning the powerful means you render very useful thoughts via this blog and as well recommend participation from the others about this area of interest and my simple princess is without question being taught a whole lot. Have fun with the rest of the new year. You are conducting a powerful job.

  • It’s my belief that mesothelioma is usually the most deadly cancer. It has unusual attributes. The more I look at it the harder I am persuaded it does not act like a true solid tissue cancer. If perhaps mesothelioma is usually a rogue viral infection, therefore there is the probability of developing a vaccine in addition to offering vaccination to asbestos open people who are vulnerable to high risk involving developing long term asbestos associated malignancies. Thanks for giving your ideas for this important ailment.

  • Hi there, I found your web site via Google whilst looking for a comparable topic, your web site got here up, it seems to be great. I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

  • obviously like your web site however you need to test the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling issues and I to find it very troublesome to tell the reality however I will definitely come back again.

  • Today, I went to the beach with my children. I found a sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She placed the shell to her ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear. She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is totally off topic but I had to tell someone!

  • you’re in point of fact a excellent webmaster. The website loading velocity is amazing. It sort of feels that you are doing any distinctive trick. Also, The contents are masterwork. you have performed a fantastic activity in this matter!

  • Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is fundamental and all. However think about if you added some great pictures or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with pics and videos, this site could undeniably be one of the best in its niche. Superb blog!

  • Nice post. I was checking continuously this blog and I am impressed! Extremely helpful information specifically the last part 🙂 I care for such information much. I was looking for this certain info for a long time. Thank you and best of luck.

  • What i don’t understood is actually how you’re no longer actually a lot more neatly-liked than you might be right now. You’re very intelligent. You know therefore significantly in relation to this matter, produced me for my part believe it from a lot of various angles. Its like men and women aren’t involved unless it is one thing to accomplish with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs nice. Always maintain it up!

  • I must express my thanks to you just for bailing me out of this type of instance. Because of surfing through the the net and finding ways which are not beneficial, I was thinking my life was done. Living minus the solutions to the problems you’ve solved all through your good article content is a critical case, and the ones that might have negatively affected my career if I had not discovered your web blog. Your skills and kindness in controlling the whole lot was priceless. I am not sure what I would’ve done if I had not encountered such a subject like this. It’s possible to at this time look forward to my future. Thanks for your time so much for your professional and sensible help. I will not hesitate to propose your blog to any person who requires tips about this topic.

  • My wife and i were lucky John could finish off his investigations through the precious recommendations he grabbed through your web page. It’s not at all simplistic to simply continually be freely giving helpful tips that many people today could have been making money from. We really recognize we need the blog owner to give thanks to for that. The type of explanations you have made, the simple blog menu, the relationships you will help promote – it is mostly fantastic, and it is facilitating our son and us consider that that article is fun, and that is particularly important. Many thanks for all the pieces!

  • Thanks for your posting. I also feel that laptop computers are getting to be more and more popular right now, and now are usually the only kind of computer utilised in a household. This is because at the same time actually becoming more and more affordable, their working power is growing to the point where they’re as effective as personal computers through just a few years ago.

  • Oh my goodness! an amazing article dude. Thank you However I am experiencing situation with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting similar rss drawback? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Thnkx

  • Pretty component of content. I simply stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to assert that I get actually loved account your weblog posts. Anyway I will be subscribing on your augment or even I fulfillment you get admission to persistently fast.

  • With havin so much content do you ever run into any problems of plagorism or copyright infringement? My website has a lot of exclusive content I’ve either created myself or outsourced but it looks like a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet without my permission. Do you know any techniques to help reduce content from being stolen? I’d genuinely appreciate it.

  • Do you have a spam problem on this blog; I also am a blogger, and I was wanting to know your situation; we have created some nice practices and we are looking to swap strategies with others, why not shoot me an e-mail if interested.

  • My husband and i have been quite ecstatic when Michael managed to finish up his survey because of the precious recommendations he acquired from your web site. It’s not at all simplistic to just continually be offering helpful hints which often others might have been selling. And we also remember we need you to appreciate for this. The illustrations you made, the straightforward site menu, the friendships you can give support to engender – it is mostly spectacular, and it is aiding our son and us do think that subject matter is cool, and that’s quite serious. Thanks for all the pieces!

  • hi!,I like your writing very so much! proportion we be in contact more approximately your article on AOL? I need a specialist in this area to resolve my problem. Maybe that is you! Having a look ahead to see you.

  • My brother suggested I might like this web site. He was totally right. This post actually made my day. You cann’t imagine simply how much time I had spent for this info! Thanks!

  • hey there and thank you to your info – I have certainly picked up anything new from right here. I did alternatively expertise several technical points the use of this website, since I experienced to reload the web site a lot of times previous to I could get it to load properly. I were thinking about in case your web hosting is OK? Not that I’m complaining, however slow loading cases occasions will very frequently have an effect on your placement in google and could damage your high-quality score if ads and ***********|advertising|advertising|advertising and *********** with Adwords. Well I am adding this RSS to my e-mail and can glance out for much extra of your respective interesting content. Ensure that you update this again soon..

  • Hello there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and found that it’s really informative. I’m gonna watch out for brussels. I will be grateful if you continue this in future. Many people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  • Thank you, I’ve recently been looking for information about this topic for a while and yours is the greatest I have came upon till now. However, what about the bottom line? Are you positive in regards to the source?

  • Simply desire to say your article is as surprising. The clearness in your put up is just cool and that i can think you are knowledgeable in this subject. Well with your permission allow me to seize your RSS feed to keep updated with drawing close post. Thanks 1,000,000 and please carry on the enjoyable work.

  • I’ve been browsing on-line more than 3 hours lately, but I never found any attention-grabbing article like yours. It’s pretty price enough for me. In my opinion, if all webmasters and bloggers made just right content as you did, the internet will be much more helpful than ever before. “I finally realized that being grateful to my body was key to giving more love to myself.” by Oprah Winfrey.

  • Hello this is kind of of off topic but I was wanting to know if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding skills so I wanted to get guidance from someone with experience. Any help would be enormously appreciated!

  • I simply couldn’t leave your site prior to suggesting that I actually loved the usual information a person provide to your visitors? Is going to be back incessantly in order to inspect new posts

  • My brother suggested I might like this web site. He was totally right. This post truly made my day. You cann’t imagine simply how much time I had spent for this information! Thanks!

  • Hey very cool website!! Guy .. Excellent .. Wonderful .. I will bookmark your website and take the feeds additionally…I’m satisfied to find a lot of helpful info right here in the submit, we’d like work out extra techniques on this regard, thanks for sharing.

  • Hello, I think your blog might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your blog in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, terrific blog!

  • I do not even know the way I stopped up right here, however I thought this post was good. I do not recognize who you’re however certainly you’re going to a well-known blogger when you aren’t already 😉 Cheers!

  • Hiya, I am really glad I’ve found this info. Today bloggers publish just about gossips and web and this is really annoying. A good web site with interesting content, that’s what I need. Thanks for keeping this web-site, I’ll be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Can not find it.

Comments are closed.

Contact

If you would like further information or require assistance, please get in touch.

ERIK
MAGRAKEN

Personal Injury Lawyer

When not writing the BC Injury Law Blog, Erik is the managing partner at MacIsaac & Company, based in Victoria, B.C. He is also involved with combative sports regulatory issues and authors the Combat Sports Law Blog.

“Work hard, be kind and enjoy the ride!”
Erik’s Philosophy

Disclaimer