BC Court of Appeal Discusses Duties of Motorists and Pedestrians in a Parking Lot

Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Court of Appeal addressing the legal duties of both motorists and pedestrians while in a parking lot.
In today’s case (Russell v. Parks) the Plaintiff pedestrian was walking in a parking lot and was “about 6 feet into a a marked parking stall” when the Defendant backed his vehicle into the same stall and struck the Plaintiff.  At trial the the Court found the pedestrian was 2/3 at fault for the incident.  In overturning this to a 25/75 split in the pedestrians favour the BC Court of Appeal provided the following reasons addressing the parties duties:
[16]         In my respectful opinion, the trial judge erred in law by applying s. 179(2), rather than ss. 180 and 181, to the circumstances of this case. Madam Justice Rowles’ analysis in Loewen v. Bernardi, and the wording of s. 179, when viewed as a whole, describe a code of conduct for vehicles and pedestrians who are approaching or entering a crosswalk. Where, as in this case, there are no crosswalks, ss. 180 and 181 are more appropriate. Section 180 imposes a duty on the pedestrian to yield the right of way to a vehicle when crossing a highway at a point not in a crosswalk. Under the Motor Vehicle Act, a parking lot falls within the definition of “highway”. Mr. Russell was crossing through a parking lot and it is clear that he was not using a crosswalk, therefore s. 180 applies. Section 181 imposes a corresponding duty on a driver “to exercise due care to avoid colliding with a pedestrian on a highway.”  The standard of “due care” will obviously be higher in a parking lot than, for example, on a freeway, because one can expect pedestrians to be using that space. This approach is consistent with Bohati v. Jewell (1996) 84 B.C.A.C. 161, another “parking lot” case, where this court relied on what are now ss. 180 and 181 to apportion liability. Sections 180 and 181, rather than s. 179(2), have also been relied upon in lower court decisions involving parking lots: see Gray v. Ellis, 2006 BCSC 1808, and Davidson v. Donnelly, [1996] B.C.J. No. 800 (S.C.).
[17]         Even if Mr. Russell did leave a place of safety, the trial judge erred in his interpretation of s. 179(2) by considering only part of it. This provision has two components: a pedestrian must leave a place of safetyand this must be done so suddenly that it is “impracticable for the driver to yield the right of way.” The trial judge’s findings clearly indicate it was not impracticable for Mr. Parks to yield the right of way. He found that Mr. Parks could have stopped and avoided the accident had he been keeping a proper lookout (para. 34). In my view, s. 179(2) contemplates a situation where the pedestrian steps onto a path designated for pedestrians (such as a crosswalk) but in doing so steps immediately into the path of a moving vehicle that could not practicably yield the right of way in time. According to the trial judge’s findings, this does not describe the situation in which Mr. Russell and Mr. Parks found themselves.
[18]         Mr. Russell argues that if he was not in violation of the statutory obligation pursuant to s. 179(2), he is not contributorily liable. I would not disturb the trial judge’s finding that he breached his common law (and statutory) duty to exercise due care and that this contributed to his injuries. The trial judge found that Mr. Russell was looking down as he walked into the parking stall, and as a result, failed to take reasonable care for his own safety. There is no basis on which to interfere with this conclusion.
[19]         The next question is whether the apportionment of liability was grossly disproportionate to what this court would have ordered (see Moses, supra, para. 33). Each assessment will turn on the facts of the case. In this instance, Mr. Russell was looking down as he stepped over the barrier, and continued to look down as he took a few steps into the parking stall. Mr. Parks was aware that there were pedestrians in the area, entered the lot from a direction that required him to swing wide to enter a parking stall, changed his mind at the last minute in terms of which stall he would take, shoulder checked numerous times, and ended up driving forward when he was looking backward, striking Mr. Russell. Clearly both were at fault. However, finding that Mr. Russell was two-thirds responsible for the accident, in my respectful view, is grossly disproportionate to his fault. The trial judge was clearly influenced by the finding that Mr. Russell had breached his statutory duty under s. 179(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act by leaving a “place of safety”. As I have explained above, this finding was in error. Although Mr. Russell was looking down as he walked, he did not step off a curb or shoulder into moving traffic (which is what s. 179(2) is designed to prevent) and his fault should not be assessed as if he did.
[20]         In Loewen v. Bernardi, this court reduced a finding of liability against the pedestrian plaintiff from 25% to 10% on the basis that the plaintiff’s contribution was minor. In that case, the plaintiff was half-way through a marked crosswalk when he was struck by a vehicle. I would not characterize Mr. Russell’s degree of fault as “minor”. On the other hand, it was not the main cause of the accident. The main cause was the fact that Mr. Parks drove forward while he was looking backward. I would allow the appeal on this ground and apportion liability on the basis of 75% against Mr. Parks and 25% against Mr. Russell.
 

bc injury law, Parking Lot Collisions, Pedestrian Collisions, Russell v. Parks

Comments (51)

  • I simply want to mention I am just newbie to blogging and honestly liked this blog. More than likely I’m likely to bookmark your blog . You definitely come with superb posts. With thanks for revealing your website.

  • My spouse and i were very fulfilled Edward managed to finish off his research from your ideas he was given from your web page. It’s not at all simplistic to just be giving freely hints that many people could have been selling. And we also fully understand we have the website owner to thank for that. The type of explanations you’ve made, the simple blog menu, the relationships you make it possible to engender – it’s most remarkable, and it’s leading our son and the family do think that theme is excellent, which is certainly incredibly essential. Thanks for everything!

  • Thank you a lot for providing individuals with an exceptionally special chance to discover important secrets from this web site. It’s usually very beneficial and also full of a great time for me and my office friends to search your website minimum thrice in one week to find out the new guidance you will have. And lastly, I’m so usually contented with your tremendous techniques you give. Selected 1 tips in this post are honestly the best we’ve ever had.

  • Thanks for your entire labor on this website. My mum enjoys setting aside time for investigations and it’s really simple to grasp why. My spouse and i learn all regarding the dynamic way you produce sensible tricks through your blog and invigorate participation from some other people on that content and my girl is certainly being taught a lot. Take advantage of the rest of the year. You are doing a wonderful job.

  • It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d most certainly donate to this fantastic blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to brand new updates and will talk about this site with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

  • I’m really impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it’s rare to see a great blog like this one these days..

  • Please let me know if you’re looking for a article writer for your site. You have some really good articles and I feel I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d really like to write some articles for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please blast me an e-mail if interested. Regards!

  • Heya i’m for the first time here. I came across this board and I find It really useful & it helped me out a lot. I hope to give something back and help others like you aided me.

  • Hey, I think your website might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your blog site in Opera, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, amazing blog!

  • I simply couldn’t depart your web site before suggesting that I extremely loved the usual info an individual supply on your visitors? Is going to be again regularly in order to check out new posts

  • Nice read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he just bought me lunch since I found it for him smile Thus let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch!

  • Usually I don’t read post on blogs, but I would like to say that this write-up very forced me to take a look at and do so! Your writing taste has been amazed me. Thank you, quite great post.

  • Yet another issue is that video games are typically serious anyway with the primary focus on finding out rather than amusement. Although, it comes with an entertainment aspect to keep your young ones engaged, just about every game is frequently designed to develop a specific expertise or curriculum, such as math or technology. Thanks for your article.

  • Thank you for sharing excellent informations. Your website is so cool. I am impressed by the details that you have on this blog. It reveals how nicely you perceive this subject. Bookmarked this website page, will come back for extra articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found simply the info I already searched all over the place and just could not come across. What an ideal website.

  • I not to mention my pals ended up following the best solutions found on your web site then then I had a horrible suspicion I never thanked the web blog owner for those strategies. Most of the people happened to be consequently excited to learn all of them and already have surely been enjoying them. We appreciate you simply being very accommodating and then for utilizing variety of cool things most people are really desperate to learn about. Our own sincere apologies for not saying thanks to you sooner.

  • Hello There. I discovered your blog the usage of msn. This is a very well written article. I’ll be sure to bookmark it and return to learn more of your helpful information. Thanks for the post. I’ll certainly return.

  • One more thing to say is that an online business administration training is designed for people to be able to easily proceed to bachelor’s degree courses. The 90 credit certification meets the lower bachelor diploma requirements so when you earn your own associate of arts in BA online, you will possess access to the modern technologies within this field. Several reasons why students are able to get their associate degree in business is because they may be interested in this area and want to get the general knowledge necessary previous to jumping right bachelor college diploma program. Thanks alot : ) for the tips you actually provide as part of your blog.

  • There are some interesting time limits on this article but I don’t know if I see all of them middle to heart. There’s some validity however I will take hold opinion till I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we would like extra! Added to FeedBurner as well

  • I am curious to find out what blog system you happen to be utilizing? I’m having some minor security problems with my latest website and I’d like to find something more safe. Do you have any recommendations?

  • I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own weblog and was curious what all is required to get setup? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very internet smart so I’m not 100 positive. Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you

  • Thanks for another great post. Where else could anybody get that kind of info in such an ideal way of writing? I’ve a presentation next week, and I’m on the look for such information.

  • Good day! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and say I really enjoy reading your articles. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that cover the same subjects? Thanks!

  • Excellent site. Lots of helpful information here. I¡¦m sending it to several friends ans also sharing in delicious. And certainly, thank you in your effort!

  • Thanks for sharing excellent informations. Your web site is very cool. I am impressed by the details that you have on this website. It reveals how nicely you perceive this subject. Bookmarked this website page, will come back for extra articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found simply the information I already searched everywhere and just couldn’t come across. What an ideal website.

  • Great weblog here! Also your website lots up fast! What host are you using? Can I am getting your associate hyperlink in your host? I desire my web site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  • Good day very nice site!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Superb .. I’ll bookmark your site and take the feeds also…I am satisfied to find numerous useful info right here in the put up, we need develop more techniques in this regard, thank you for sharing.

Comments are closed.

Contact

If you would like further information or require assistance, please get in touch.

ERIK
MAGRAKEN

Personal Injury Lawyer

When not writing the BC Injury Law Blog, Erik is the managing partner at MacIsaac & Company, based in Victoria, B.C. He is also involved with combative sports regulatory issues and authors the Combat Sports Law Blog.

“Work hard, be kind and enjoy the ride!”
Erik’s Philosophy

Disclaimer