Skip to main content
Search Results for “rule 37b

More Judicial Interpretation of Rule 37B

I have blogged many times about the relatively new BC Supreme Court Rule 37B (the rule dealing with formal settlement offers).  You can search the archives of this blog to find my previous entries. Useful reasons were released today by the BC Supreme Court providing further clarity and development of this rule.   The key […]

More on Settlement Offers and Rule 37B

Reasons for judgement were released today refusing to award the successful litigant double costs pursuant to Rule 37B. The Petitioner City sued the Respondent Kennel operator seeking a declaration that the Kennel was in breach of a Bylaw and seeking conjunctive orders.  Before trial (and before Rule 37 was replaced with Rule 37B) the Respondent […]

Rule 37B and ICBC – J. Boyd Considers fact Defendant Insured by ICBC

As you may know Rule 37-B is the new BC rule dealing with formal settlements and costs consequences in the BC Supreme Court.  (to find my previous posts on this case search this cite for ’37B’). This new rule will take some time to work itself out.  There are already conflicting reasons for judgement addressing […]

More on ICBC, Rule 37B and Costs

I have previously blogged about the new Rule 37B (here and here) which deals with formal offers of settlement and the costs consequences of trial. The first case that I’m aware of dealing with Rule 37B in an ICBC claim was released today. In this case both fault and quantum were at issue.  The Plaintiff […]

Rule 37B – The First Precedent

Today I’m blogging from the sunny City of Vernon, having completed an examination for discovery a little earlier than expected with some time on my hands prior to returning to Victoria. In the first precedent that I am aware of concening Rule 37B (The new BC Supreme Court Rule dealing with formal settlement offers) reasons […]

Rule 15-1 and Pre Trial Settlement Costs

Useful reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Chilliwack Registry, addressing costs consequences when fast track cases settle prior to the first day of trial.  In short the Court held that the rules operate to fix lump sum costs of $6,500 in these circumstances. In today’s case (Gill v. Widjaja) the […]

More on the New Rules, Formal Settlement Offers and Timelines for Acceptance

As I’ve previously written, the new formal settlement offer rule (Rule 9) reads almost identically to the former Rule 37B.   Under the former rules BC Courts were reluctant to have formal settlement offers trigger costs consequences following trial where the offer was open for acceptance for a short period of time.  Reasons for judgment […]

New Formal Settlement Offer Rule Treated the Same as the Old

A further decision dealing with the consequences of formal settlement offers under the New BC Supreme Court Civil Rules was released today by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry. In today’s case (Gregory v. ICBC) the Plaintiff was injured in a BC motor vehicle collision.  Prior to trial ICBC made a formal settlement offer […]

New Formal Settlement Offer Rule Gets First Judicial Interpretation

The first judgement that I’m aware of dealing with the new formal settlement offer rule (Rule 9) was released today by the BC Supreme Court. In today’s case (Demarzo v. Michaud) the Plaintiff was injured in a BC motor vehicle collision.  He went to trial and was awarded $356,000 in total damages.  (you can click […]