Written by admin on . Posted in Uncategorized.
In late 2014 the BC Supreme Court rules that ICBC wage loss benefits can be ‘revived’ if a collision related injury which was initially disabling retriggers disability beyond the 104 week mark. ICBC appealed but in reasons for judgement released today the BC Court of Appeal upheld the trial court’s reasoning. In today’s case (Symons […]
Written by admin on . Posted in BCSC Civil Rule 9, Civil Procedure.
Adding to this site’s database of ICBC Unidentified Motorist prosecutions, reasons for judgement were published today by the BC Supreme Court, Kamloops Registry, finding that the Summary Judgement rule cannot be used to determine if a plaintiff made all reasonable efforts to identify the at fault driver which is a prerequisite to a successful unidentified […]
I am the Victim of a Hit and Run. Can I still claim Compensation? Yes. If your loss occurred on a highway in BC, your injury or damage arose out of the use and operation of a motor vehicle and the name of the owner and driver of that vehicle were not ascertainable, you may […]
Written by admin on . Posted in Uncategorized.
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry, dismissing a claim for damages following a hit and run collision. In today’s case (Li v. ICBC) the Plaintiff was injured in a 2010 rear end collision. After speaking with the at fault motorist the parties agreed to pull over and […]
Written by admin on . Posted in BCSC Civil Rule 15.
When a claim is prosecuted under the fast track (Rule 15) the Court has discretion to remove the case in appropriate circumstances. Reasons for judgement were recently published by the BC Supreme Court addressing such an application. In the recent case (Peters v. ICBC) the Plaintiff was struck in a crosswalk by an unidentified motorist. […]
Written by admin on . Posted in BC Injury Claims Media Archives.
Earlier this year I had the pleasure of being interviewed by Donalee Moutlon who authored an article for the Lawyers Weekly addressing obligations of motorists involved in hit and run collisions in BC. Her article was published in this week’s edition. For those of you visiting this site after reading this article, welcome! If you […]
Written by admin on . Posted in Uncategorized.
I have written numerous times about ICBC hit and run claims and a Plaintiff’s obligation to make ‘all reasonable efforts’ to identify an unknown motorist prior to being able to successfully sue ICBC for damages. Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, further addressing this obligation. In this week’s case (Akbari v. […]
Written by admin on . Posted in BCSC Civil Rule 6.
Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, addressing whether a party should be substituted in on-going litigation where the Defendant was incorrectly named due to representations of ICBC. In short the Court held substitution should be permitted in such circumstances. In this week’s case (Bedoret v. Badham) the Plaintiff was involved in […]
Written by admin on . Posted in Uncategorized.
Last year I questioned the correctness of reasons for judgement which refused to make a substitutional order in an ICBC Claim involving an unidentified motorist. Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Chilliwack Registry further addressing this area of the law finding that substitution orders are mandatory once the identity of an unidentified motorist becomes ascertained. In […]
Written by admin on . Posted in Uncategorized.
Further to my previous posts discussing legal obligations when seeking compensation following an unidentified motorist collision in BC, interesting reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, suggesting that in the right circumstances estoppel could be used to overcome a ‘failure to take reasonable efforts to identify the Defendant’ defence […]