"Standard of Perfection" Not Needed for Victims of Hit and Run Collisions

Written by admin on January 3, 2019. Posted in Uncategorized.

Reasons for judgment were published today by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, canvassing what steps are adequate for a hit and run collision victim to take in ascertaining the identify of the offending motorist before they can successfully make a claim under s. 24 of the Insurance (Vehicle) Act. In today’s case (Ghuman v. […]

Punitive Damages Awarded Against Suspended Driver Involved in Hit and Run Collision

Written by admin on October 16, 2017. Posted in Uncategorized.

In a rare case awarding punitive damages in a motor vehicle collision case reasons for judgement were released last week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, making such an award. In the recent case (Howell v. Machi) the Plaintiff pedestrian was struck by a motorist who fled the scene of the collision. The Plaintiff […]

Court Critical of ICBC Practices Following Hit and Run Collisions

Written by admin on October 14, 2015. Posted in Uncategorized.

Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Kamloops Registry, with critical comments aimed at ICBC for their practices in dealing with hit and run claims. In today’s case (Fitger v. John Doe) the Plaintiff was injured by the actions of an unidentified motorist. The Plaintiff contacted ICBC shortly after the collision […]

I Am The Victim Of A Hit And Run. Can I Still Claim Compensation?

I am the Victim of a Hit and Run. Can I still claim Compensation? Yes. If your loss occurred on a highway in BC, your injury or damage arose out of the use and operation of a motor vehicle and the name of the owner and driver of that vehicle were not ascertainable, you may […]

Court Finds ICBC Under No Legal Duty To Inform an Insured of Hit and Run Claim Obligations

Written by admin on June 15, 2015. Posted in Uncategorized.

Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry, dismissing a claim for damages following a hit and run collision. In today’s case (Li v. ICBC) the Plaintiff was injured in a 2010 rear end collision. After speaking with the at fault motorist the parties agreed to pull over and […]

Field Used as Parking Lot Deemed "Highway" In ICBC Hit and Run Claim

Written by admin on January 17, 2013. Posted in ICBC Liability (fault) Cases, Uncategorized.

One of the restrictions in bringing a lawsuit against ICBC for damages caused by an unidentified motorist is the incident needs to occur on a “highway“. Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Vernon Registry, addressing the definition of highway in the context of a hit and run claim. In […]

Hit and Run Identity Obligations Don't Require a Motorist to Go on "A Fool's Errand"

Written by admin on November 27, 2012. Posted in Uncategorized.

I have written numerous times about ICBC hit and run claims and a Plaintiff’s obligation to make ‘all reasonable efforts’ to identify an unknown motorist prior to being able to successfully sue ICBC for damages. Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, further addressing this obligation. In this week’s case (Akbari v. […]

Substitution Orders in ICBC Hit and Run Claims are "Mandatory in Their Nature"

Written by admin on November 15, 2012. Posted in Uncategorized.

Last year I questioned the correctness of reasons for judgement which refused to make a substitutional order in an ICBC Claim involving an unidentified motorist. Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Chilliwack Registry further addressing this area of the law finding that substitution orders are mandatory once the identity of an unidentified motorist becomes ascertained. In […]

ICBC Hit and Run Claims, Reasonable Efforts and Estoppel

Written by admin on August 15, 2012. Posted in Uncategorized.

Further to my previous posts discussing legal obligations when seeking compensation following an unidentified motorist collision in BC, interesting reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, suggesting that in the right circumstances estoppel could be used to overcome a ‘failure to take reasonable efforts to identify the Defendant’ defence […]

Employer Paid Wage Replacement Benefits Non-Deductible in Hit and Run Claims

Written by admin on January 9, 2012. Posted in ICBC Wage Loss, Uncategorized.

Section 106 of the Insurance (Vehicle) Regulation permits ICBC to reduce compensation by any amount paid by another “insured claim” in claims for injuries caused by unidentified motorists or uninsured motorists under section 24 and section 20 of the Insurance (Vehicle) Act . Reasons for judgement were released last week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, addressing whether […]

Search Results for “hit and run”