Court Orders Particulars of Special Damages to Be Disclosed at Case Planning Conference
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, ordering a Plaintiff to provide particulars of claimed special damages.
In this week’s case (Amezcua v. Norlander) the Plaintiff was injured in two collisions. The Defendants applied, at a Case Planning Conference, that the Plaintiff produce particulars of special damages. In agreeing that this was an appropriate order Master Baker provided the following reasons:
 …In particular leading authorities on pleading confirm that it is appropriate to expect a party to plead details of special damages and, if they are not given, to demand particulars. The author of Odgers On High Court Pleading and Practice cites, as an illustration, Hayward v. Pullinger & Partners Ltd.:
But when any special damage is claimed, without sufficient detail, particulars will be ordered of the alleged damage…
More recently and locally the authors of Conduct of Civil Litigation in British Columbia comment:
Special damages must explicitly be claimed and proved.
And further, in relation to past wage loss:
…but the weight of the authority treats these as special damages which therefore must be specifically pleaded; the defendant is also entitled to particulars.
I cite this latter quote not in respect of wage losses per se, but for the implicit assumption that a defendant is entitled to particulars of special damages.
 I cannot see, then, why a party should not be required to particularize his or her special damages to date. The same, of course, cannot be said for general damages, but the defence is not asking for that. The plaintiff will therefore give particulars of her special damages to date.