BC Injury Law and ICBC Claims Blog

The Answer is Discretion…Jury Strike Application Fails in Case with 32 Expert Reports

Last month I highlighted reasons for judgement where a jury strike¬†application¬†succeeded in a personal injury trial with 30 expert reports was deemed “too complex” for that mode of trial. ¬†In a good illustration that there is no¬†certain¬†outcome when it comes to discretionary orders, reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, dismissing a jury strike application in a case with fairly similar facts.

In this week’s case (Henshall v. Plona) the Plaintiff alleged brain injury from a 2005 collision. ¬†Liability was disputed and further the defendant argued that “credibility of the plaintiff is a key issue at trial. The defendants say that the evidence reveals significant conflicts in the evidence, including the plaintiff‚Äôs failure to disclose his significant pre-accident history of head injuries and drug and alcohol use.

The matter was set for a 25 day trial which was combined with two other injury claims the¬†Plaintiff¬†was advancing from subsequent collisions. ¬† In the course of the lawsuit a total of 32 expert reports were obtained by the litigants. ¬†The Plaintiff argued the sheer volume of evidence would “overwhelm a jury“. ¬†Master Taylor disagreed and dismissed the Plaintiff’s application concluding as follows:

[27]         Given the particular facts of this case, I have concluded that the applicant has failed to satisfy me that the jury notice should be struck based on the grounds articulated in R. 12-6(5)(a), either alone or collectively. Accordingly, the application is dismissed with costs to the defendants.

 

If you found this article useful please share with others:
  • TwitThis
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

 

This site is created by MacIsaac & Company, a British Columbia Personal Injury Lawfirm. This website is not affiliated in any way with the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC).This web site is made possible through funding provided by the British Columbia law firm MacIsaac and Company. bc-injury-law.com is designed to empower individuals to better understand their ICBC Claim and the process involved in dealing with ICBC. This web site is offered for information only and is not claim-specific legal advice. Use of the site and sending or receiving information through it does not establish a solicitor / client relationship. Links to and from this website do not state or imply a relationship between MacIsaac and Company and the linked entity.

Copyright © 2008 The MacIsaac Group of Law Firms. All rights reserved.
Web Site Design by Sage Internet Solutions Ltd.