Subscribe to the ICBC Law Blog 
Subscribe via Email 
Visit my Linked In profile 
Follow me on Twitter 
Visit my JDSupra profile 
Visit my Facebook Business page 
Free Video Consultations via SKYPE
Media Requests
Client Satisfaction Survey
BC Injury Law Podcast: Non-Pecuniary Damages
This is the first in what I intend to be a series of podcasts discussing topics of interest involving ICBC and other BC personal injury claims.
Today’s topic is valuing a person’s non-pecuniary damages (money for pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life) as a result of injuries caused by the fault of another. Â To listen simply click on the following link: Â bc-injury-law-podcast-non-pecuniary-damages
The case discussed in this Podcast is Stapley v. Hejslet, 2006 BCCA 34 and can be found by clicking here.
Tags: bc injury law, BC Injury Law Podcast, loss of enjoyment of life, non-pecuniary damages, pain and suffering awards, Stapley v. Hejslet
This site is created by MacIsaac & Company, a British Columbia Personal Injury Lawfirm. This website is not affiliated in any way with the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC).This web site is made possible through funding provided by the British Columbia law firm MacIsaac and Company. bc-injury-law.com is designed to empower individuals to better understand their ICBC Claim and the process involved in dealing with ICBC. This web site is offered for information only and is not claim-specific legal advice. Use of the site and sending or receiving information through it does not establish a solicitor / client relationship. Links to and from this website do not state or imply a relationship between MacIsaac and Company and the linked entity.
January 7th, 2011 at 9:19 am
[…] I further discussed the factors Courts consider in valuing claims for non-pecuniary damages (money for pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life) in this previous podcast. […]
January 26th, 2011 at 8:16 am
[…] great free public resource to note-up case-law is Canlii. Â As previously discussed, Canlii is a free Canadian legal research database. Â When you look up any given reported case a […]
September 21st, 2011 at 7:54 am
[…] doctor’s visits in and of themselves do not assist in valuing a personal injury claim. Â You can click here for a short discussion addressing the factors Court’s often consider when assessing non-pecuniary damages (money for […]
November 24th, 2011 at 8:12 am
[…] a discussion of the factors BC Courts do consider in assessing non-pecuniary damages you can click here for a podcast I uploaded last year. If you found this article useful please share with […]